We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Life cover advice please
vickk
Posts: 76 Forumite
My daughter and her partner have just bought a house together and are wondering the best way to make sure the mortgage is paid should either one of them die.
They both have company pensions that have life assurance attached but neither of those would cover the mortgage on there own. They are both mid 30's non smokers.
Are they better looking for a general life cover policy or one specifically designed to repay a mortgage?
Are they better looking for a single joint policy or 2 separate polices.
The whole thing seems a minefield to me
They both have company pensions that have life assurance attached but neither of those would cover the mortgage on there own. They are both mid 30's non smokers.
Are they better looking for a general life cover policy or one specifically designed to repay a mortgage?
Are they better looking for a single joint policy or 2 separate polices.
The whole thing seems a minefield to me
0
Comments
-
Are they better looking for a general life cover policy or one specifically designed to repay a mortgage?
There is no such thing as a general life cover policy. There are about 13 different types of life assurance in the UK although most are no longer mainstream. The two main ones are level term assurance and decreasing term assurance. The latter tends to be used for estate planning and capital and repayment mortgages.
So, if they have got a capital and repayment mortgage then a decreasing term assurance would be the product that fits.Are they better looking for a single joint policy or 2 separate polices.
The debt only needs to be paid off once. So, no point having two.
Death in service is primarily there to replace immediate lost income and reduced pension provision for the surviving spouse/partner. Especially with unmarried couples who may not get the pension of the deceased.They both have company pensions that have life assurance attached but neither of those would cover the mortgage on there own. They are both mid 30's non smokers.
So, if they earmark the death in service against the mortgage, then they are going to be short on covering lost income and reduced pension entitlement. It is nearly always best NOT to treat death in service as sufficient to cover a mortgage. Also, it may not go to the person intended with unmarried couples. The payout could go to the parents of the deceased and there is no guarantee the parents would gift the money to the surviving partner.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards