We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Carpet clean when still in rental property
Options
Comments
-
If the LL has to replace the carpet anyway when OP leaves - the only winner in going halves now is the landlord!
OP benefits from a new carpet for half the cost as LL has no obligation to replace now. How much the LL 'wins' depends on how long OP stays - if another few years, then from that point the LL has a carpet a few years old, for half the cost of a new one which seems fair not overly winning.Because replacing a carpet now is potentially cheaper to him than a new carpet in x years time and keeps a long term tenant satisfied.
Equally, not bothering the LL about an unclean carpet (responsibility of tenant) keeps a long term landlord satisfied and less likely to increased rent / eviction.0 -
OP benefits from a new carpet for half the cost as LL has no obligation to replace now. How much the LL 'wins' depends on how long OP stays - if another few years, then from that point the LL has a carpet a few years old, for half the cost of a new one which seems fair not overly winning.
But OP doesn't want a new carpet - they are happy to varnish the floorboards. Paying 50% to have 'enjoyment' of something you never wanted is not a benefit!0 -
OP benefits from a new carpet for half the cost as LL has no obligation to replace now. How much the LL 'wins' depends on how long OP stays - if another few years, then from that point the LL has a carpet a few years old, for half the cost of a new one which seems fair not overly winning.
Equally, not bothering the LL about an unclean carpet (responsibility of tenant) keeps a long term landlord satisfied and less likely to increased rent / eviction.
OP can rip up the carpet and dispose of it for next to no cost....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards