Irrelevant Defences and How To Avoid Them

waamo

Just post questions in your original thread. No need to hijack other threads.

HMFrustrated

Have you any known defences where it is believed that the PPC has either intentionally or unintentionally broken the BPA Code of Practice Version 7 - January 2018 Paragraph 9.5?

I believe Minster Baywatch have and have followed that up by being evasive in their response to me queries.

Coupon-mad

Most defences mention a breach of the CoP, because IMHO most PPCs do not play nicely.

This thread is ONLY about ''irrelevant defences and how to avoid them''.

HMFrustrated

Thanks Coupon,

I was hoping there might be a template out there covering para. 9.5 of the code of Practice which I believe they have used misleading tactics and now also since I have read more, paragraph 22.12 regarding appeal rejection letters.

If not I shall knock summat up I expect :beer:

pogofish

Azazel wrote: »

and what I have to do next?

Start your own thread! - You clearly agreed not to hijack as part of your signup.

Sydal

I didn't realise any of this and got letter from cel saying they are claiming 320 pounds. I sent defence back saying I have received no other letters whatsoever regarding this and they can't just send me a letter out of nowhere regarding this. I think I have messed up. Now I have a dq to fill.

Quentin

Everyone is politely asked to read up on this in the Newbies FAQ thread near the top of the forum before starting a new thread

Please delete your post above, read up on this in the Newbies FAQ and if you have any questions not answered there start your own thread

ryou4me

would stopping whilst making deliveries be wise to mention on defence or no?

obviously somewhere like city centre's where parking is difficult especially flats and the like

Fruitcake

ryou4me wrote: »

would stopping whilst making deliveries be wise to mention on defence or no?

obviously somewhere like city centre's where parking is difficult especially flats and the like

Loading/unloading/delivering is not parking. Look up the Laura Johnson vs Homeguard Services case for more information, and quote it in your defence.

Start your own thread if you need further help.

Coupon-mad

ryou4me wrote: »

would stopping whilst making deliveries be wise to mention on defence or no?

obviously somewhere like city centre's where parking is difficult especially flats and the like

Very wise to base a defence on that, yes, adducing Jopson v Homeguard (read the transcript now, Google it an find it in the ParkingPrankster's case law pages).

You will see why it helps, and it's an appeal decision = persuasive to county court.