We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can i claim, no paperwork, ended policy in 1997

Hi all,

When i was 18 I bought the property in which i still reside. At the time i took out accident, sickness and redundancy policy to cover me with any misfortune and ensure mortgage payments would still be made. However, in 1997 I was made redundant and i remember contacting this copmpany to inform. At the time they said because I was under the age of 25 I woulnt be able to make a claim. On that day I cancelled the policy as it was no use to me and didnt fulfil its intentions.
Now I am looking to claim back... I remeber making payments of 17.50 per month. The problem is, I dont have any paperwork and only from memory remeber the company was called Pheonix, which no longer trade. I no longer have the bank account which this payments was made from. I called the bank this morning and given how long ago they no longer hold my records on a closed account. I have also called a couple of insurance companies that were linked to Pheonix but they also state that paperwork that old has now been destroyed... does this mean I wont be able to take this any further.
Its so annoying as at that time, I was 24, no job, trying to make mortgage paymets and struggled. I felt devestated when the policy didnt come through with some stupid excuse due to my age. The money would not feel justice has been redeemed...but I could really do with every penny right now :/...
I would really appreciate to hear from anyone who can help. Thank you

Comments

  • Nineteen years after the account was closed you have no chance with this.

    Even if you had full details of the account, it's eight years prior to regulation and you say the firm is no longer trading.

    Time to forget about this one and move on...
  • Oh no....ive dug around some more and found the policy was held with Royal Life, Royal insurance...who apparently are now called Pheonix...do i still have no chance? :(
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    At the time i took out accident, sickness and redundancy policy to cover me with any misfortune and ensure mortgage payments would still be made.

    Sounds like a very sensible thing to do. That is why most MPPI complaints fail to succeed and why you can still buy MPPI today.
    However, in 1997 I was made redundant and i remember contacting this copmpany to inform. At the time they said because I was under the age of 25 I woulnt be able to make a claim. On that day I cancelled the policy as it was no use to me and didnt fulfil its intentions.

    And at that point it activates 3 years to complain otherwise it can be timebarred.

    The policy sounds like it was not sold by a bank or building society (as it was not bank/bs branded). So, this would suggest a broker or adviser firm was used. They did not become regulated until Jan 05. So, this is a pre-regulation case.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thank you for taking the time to respond....Does that mean it ends here?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You would have to complain to the original firm that sold it.

    1 - They could automatically refuse to consider your complaint as it was pre-regulation. They would have to volunteer to look at it (unlikely)
    2 - They could time bar the complaint as the 3 and 6 year rules are both satisfied.
    3 - There would need to be records
    4 - They would still need to exist.
    5 - You dont have access to the FOS or the FSCS (so cant use either of those two if the firm does not exist).

    So, effectively, this is dead in the water.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thank you... blummin' unfair in 1997...and now it would seem. I appreciate your time, comments and advice. Many thanks
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.