PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Indemnity insurnace for defective Lease

Hi, conveyancing advice please?

My wife is selling her late father's flat. Her solicitor has written to her that the buyer's solicitors have identified the need for an indemnity insurance policy to be taken out because the property has a defective lease. The Third Schedule of the lease as delineated and “coloured pink” on the lease plan, does not contain any colouring. MY wife's solicitor agrees with the defect and has recommended a reputable policy for one-off payment of £149 plus her admin fees, to indefinitely protect the buyer and subsequent occupiers of the property against any claims against defective lease. My wife's solicitor has confirmed that this is one-off and there would be no ongoing liability after completion.

My question is, to me this seems very trivial issue just because the plan isn't coloured? Is the indemnity insurance necessary? Or are the solicitors trying to make bit more money?

My wife has used her solicitors number of times. They are meant to be conveyancing specialists and commonly used in area we live.

Thank you.

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Depends on whether there is genuine scope for ambiguity. Have you looked at the plan yourself? What is the plan actually defining?
  • I haven't neither has my wife. Its never been in her possession or her dad's. Its a flat in a block of 10. The lease is kept with managing agents who represent the freeholding company which my wife's father had 1/10 share of. My wife had the title deeds that anyone can get from Land Registry. The plan is coloured on that. Just seems trivial because Lease plan isn't coloured pink as described in the lease? I guess we either trust my wife's solicitor or we don't. Thanks
  • finlon
    finlon Posts: 3 Newbie
    Sixth Anniversary
    Hi there, where did you end up with this issue? I'm having a similar problem where the boundaries of the property are marked in dark pink in the plan but stated as red in the wording. My solicitor is recommending indemnity insurance but this seems ridiculous for such a trivial matter.

    Any advice appreciated, thanks.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    finlon wrote: »
    the boundaries of the property are marked in dark pink in the plan but stated as red in the wording. My solicitor is recommending indemnity insurance but this seems ridiculous for such a trivial matter
    Yes it is. Tell them to get a grip.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.