Judge questioned Gladstones competence ..

beamerguy

The Judge questioned Gladstones competence; "Do they even know what they're doing.....?" and dismissed the claim

AS Parking Gladstoned again

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/

How many PPC's want to be disgraced in court by Gladstones ?????

pappa_golf

although we hear about the odd Gladstone !!!! up , the worrying thing is that if you click on the daily court listings http://www.bmpa.eu/court.html some days its upto 90% Gladstone orientated , + I wonder how many more have been given default CCJs either thru failing to act properly ofr by changing address , the number of setasides is rising again - mainly ones that gladstones were involved in Mrs May and her mob have not listened to the complaints , nor the SRA


whereas the cases via PE were a set figure (£100 + £50 + £25) the gladstones cases (reported on here) all seem to exceed £250 .


so much for POFa , its not worked has it?

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

although we hear about the odd Gladstone !!!! up , the worrying thing is that if you click on the daily court listings http://www.bmpa.eu/court.html some days its upto 90% Gladstone orientated , + I wonder how many more have been given default CCJs either thru failing to act properly ofr by changing address , the number of setasides is rising again - mainly ones that gladstones were involved in Mrs May and her mob have not listened to the complaints , nor the SRA


whereas the cases via PE were a set figure (£100 + £50 + £25) the gladstones cases (reported on here) all seem to exceed £250 .


so much for POFa , its not worked has it?

The SRA are well known to have a tortoise like attitude.
Mrs May could well get that reputation.

I assume pappa you have sent your letter to Mrs May and the SRA.

For those who have not had a reply that is suitable then stage 2 is to show your disgust as you are being treated in contempt.

Mrs May by the way is already showing her weakness as being PM

pappa_golf

not only have I sent those letters , I have had long discussions with the SRA , mainly regarding swarts , who although sanctioned , the SRA cannot implement.
as of 31/10 Mr Swarts licence was up and is being manually reviewed. he has ask permission to work for CEL , and is not allowed to do so until permission is granted (it has not) but he is doing it and going against the wishes of the SRA .


I get the opinion they are not happy , but their hands are tied.


swarts will go , and they will hire another solicitor that is due for retirement and needs his pension topping up ,

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

I get the opinion they are not happy , but their hands are tied.

swarts will go , and they will hire another solicitor that is due for retirement and needs his pension topping up ,

I agree about Swartz but why are the SRA hands tied, are they scared of something

pappa_golf

their hands are tied because although they can issue sanctions , they cannot (legally) as the SRA implement them , that is down to The SDT (solisitors disiplinetary trimunal? ?? , also CEL do not come under their authority


Mr swarts could in theory start working for ISIS tomorrow and they cannot do anything

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

their hands are tied because although they can issue sanctions , they cannot (legally) as the SRA implement them , that is down to {will fill blank in later}

Then the SRA are clearly a defunct authority in line with the now defunct ISPA set up by the BPA

pappa_golf

beamerguy wrote: »

Then the SRA are clearly a defunct authority in line with the now defunct ISPA set up by the BPA

post above now edited , had to go and read emails , I get the impression , via phone calls and emails that its down to The SDT solisitors disiplinetary trimunal to act on sanctions by the SRA .


hopefully they have his file now we are down to licence renewal time

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

post above now edited , had to go and read emails , I get the impression , via phone calls and emails that its down to The SDT solisitors disiplinetary trimunal to act on sanctions by the SRA .


hopefully they have his file now we are down to licence renewal time

OK .... currently there are 3 bad boys plus your favourite Swartz.

BWLegal .... Gladstones .... Wright Hassall.

They will not be missed by the SRA but it will reduce all the complaints they get ..... that has to be a result

The SRA must prove their own crediblity

The_Deep

I do not think that the SRA has to prove anything. They may not act quickly, after all they are solicitors, and every "i" must be dotted, and every "t" crossed, but they will get there in the end. Just have patience..