We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lease Extenion on first time buy

Crofts
Posts: 6 Forumite
Hi,
I'm looking to purchase a flat with 71 years left on lease for 97000.
Should it be straightforward to get the seller to get a statement 43 issued so I wont have to wait 2 years to get the lease extended. Or could the lease be included in the sale price? What's the best option forward.
If I was to end up selling the flat in another couple of years would it be worth getting the lease extended at all, should it add value to the property? Or should I just sell it on without a lease extension.
Would it potentially loose a lot more value?
Thanks
I'm looking to purchase a flat with 71 years left on lease for 97000.
Should it be straightforward to get the seller to get a statement 43 issued so I wont have to wait 2 years to get the lease extended. Or could the lease be included in the sale price? What's the best option forward.
If I was to end up selling the flat in another couple of years would it be worth getting the lease extended at all, should it add value to the property? Or should I just sell it on without a lease extension.
Would it potentially loose a lot more value?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
Hi,
I'm looking to purchase a flat with 71 years left on lease for 97000.
Are you buying with a mortgage? If so, is 71 years acceptable to your lender?
If not, you will have to try to arrange for a lease extension on completion (or before).Should it be straightforward to get the seller to get a statement 43 issued so I wont have to wait 2 years to get the lease extended.
I guess you mean a section 42 notice. You just have to get the seller's agreement to do it (some sellers can't be bothered) - the fees will be a few hundred pounds.Or could the lease be included in the sale price?
It could be. As above, you could go for a lease extension on completion. But you need to negotiate a mutually acceptable deal with the freeholder. This often proves impossible.If I was to end up selling the flat in another couple of years would it be worth getting the lease extended at all, should it add value to the property? Or should I just sell it on without a lease extension.
The flat will be even harder to mortgage with less than 70 years on the lease, So it's value might drop dramatically.0 -
If a section 42 is served during the sale process then how long do you have to act on it?
Does it work out more expensive then going down the statutory route after 2 years?
Thanks0 -
If a section 42 is served during the sale process then how long do you have to act on it?
The process starts immediately once the section 42 notice is served.
- The freeholder has up to 2 months to reply with a section 45 notice.
- You then have up to 2 months to negotiate the price.
- If you can't agree a price, you have up to six months to ask a tribunal to determine a price.
If you miss any of these deadlines, you will have to wait until you've owned the flat for 2 years and start the process again by serving another section 42 notice.Does it work out more expensive then going down the statutory route after 2 years?
Serving a section 42 notice is going down the statutory route.
(You can arrange an informal lease extension with the freeholder at any time, on any basis. But you are likely to get a worse deal.)0 -
Thank-you for your reply. This is the most sense I have got out of anyone so far, including my estate agent and solicitors. At only 71 years remaining would you say it was a huge risk to wait 2 years and get the lease done then. Hopefully it wouldn't make to much difference from 71 to 69?0
-
It's probably best to try putting 71 years and then 69 years into one of the online lease extension calculators, and see how the numbers differ.
For example:
http://www.lease-advice.org/calculator/
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/mortgages/extend-your-lease
I guess there could be issues like:
- You'll have to wait 2 years to start the process
- If the freeholder is difficult, and the Tribunal is busy, it might take up to 18 months to complete the extension process.
So up to 3.5 years in total.
If something happens (e.g. you lose your job and/or you get a job in a different area) and you have to sell quickly in say 1.5 years without a lease extension, you might not get a good price.
But perhaps that's unlikely.0 -
Thanks for the reply.
I guess I need to figure out if I was to sell the flat with the lease extension would it definitely be adding money to the property and worth the extra money paid for the lease extension. How can I try and work this out?
So, say the flat purchase price is 97000 and the lease extension costs 12000
How can I know that it will be re-valued at 109000+ when I come to sell it.
thanks0 -
How can I know that it will be re-valued at 109000+ when I come to sell it.
Ask a few estate agents for their opinions.
Letting the lease drop below 70 years might have an impact on price, because a number of mortgage lenders will not lend beyond that.
See: https://www.cml.org.uk/lenders-handbook/englandandwales/question-list/1846/0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards