We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Multiple wireless access points
Comments
-
A wrong answer is no answer at all.
I am not going ro have a peeesing contest with you, just say RTFM or in the case the RFC's!!
Let's not have a tiddling contest 192.168.1.x is not a subnet , you have also made the same supposition that most use 192.168.1 mine uses 10. but subnets are defined by subnet masks and routing is done at level 3 , come back and tell the "wrong" doers where they have gone wrong, but hey you actually don't need any of the APs to support/serve DHCP, they are after all switches(or conduits with or without wires if you prefer)"As far as you know" being the operative words!!
Previous comments in this thread suggest that by simply having the same SSID and Password and different channels.
The fact is it is going to depend on manufacturer but usually without proper configuration there is conflict.
These devices all come configured with a DCHP server and most use the same subnet, 192.168.1.x but even if they use a differenr one, without configuration there can be no ROUTING
......snipped for brevity.
RFCs 1058, 2453 then go on to 6518(KARP) gosh then sell us your largest intranet in Europe4.8kWp 12x400W Longhi 9.6 kWh battery Giv-hy 5.0 Inverter, WSW facing Essex . Aint no sunshine ☀️ Octopus gas fixed dec 24 @ 5.74 tracker again+ Octopus Intelligent Flux leccy
CEC Email energyclub@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Well this escalated quickly!
All the routers being used as access points have been given static IPs on the LAN (172.16.0.x) and are set up as DHCP relays so as not to cause IP conflicts; I left that info out of the OP because I thought it was always the case with APs
I think I'm going to leave it as seperate zones, but thanks for the advice.0 -
So long as it works for you, that is good!0
-
Your actual dhcp server (usually the domain controller) should be handling dhcp ..
Seperate the guest wifi using vlan.
For what you wand , you are best off getting your comapny to put its hand in its pocket and but some propper access points designed for the job.
We did use Dlink dwl-3600AP's but have recently made the move to Meraki mr34 cloud managed AP's and they are an absolute pleasure to administer.
In fact, were not using the Dlink ones anymore - you can have them if you want them
PM me0 -
We use the Apple Express points, they cost us about £30 off ebay and we set them up as a new wireless network and give them the same SSID, password and channel. Really easy and seems to roam nicely. We do use mainly PC's here, but bought Apple due to easy use0
-
Transmitting on the same channel would give a high chance of interference between 'adjacent' Apple Express points. Using non-overlapping channels would probably give better results, IMNVHO...we set them up as a new wireless network and give them the same SSID, password and channel.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

