We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Multiple wireless access points

2»

Comments

  • debitcardmayhem
    debitcardmayhem Posts: 13,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 November 2016 at 10:00PM
    DavidP24 wrote: »
    A wrong answer is no answer at all.

    I am not going ro have a peeesing contest with you, just say RTFM or in the case the RFC's!!
    DavidP24 wrote: »
    "As far as you know" being the operative words!!

    Previous comments in this thread suggest that by simply having the same SSID and Password and different channels.

    The fact is it is going to depend on manufacturer but usually without proper configuration there is conflict.

    These devices all come configured with a DCHP server and most use the same subnet, 192.168.1.x but even if they use a differenr one, without configuration there can be no ROUTING
    ......snipped for brevity.
    Let's not have a tiddling contest 192.168.1.x is not a subnet , you have also made the same supposition that most use 192.168.1 mine uses 10. but subnets are defined by subnet masks and routing is done at level 3 , come back and tell the "wrong" doers where they have gone wrong, but hey you actually don't need any of the APs to support/serve DHCP, they are after all switches(or conduits with or without wires if you prefer)
    RFCs 1058, 2453 then go on to 6518(KARP) gosh then sell us your largest intranet in Europe
    4.8kWp 12x400W Longhi 9.6 kWh battery Giv-hy 5.0 Inverter, WSW facing Essex . Aint no sunshine ☀️ Octopus gas fixed dec 24 @ 5.74 tracker again+ Octopus Intelligent Flux leccy

    CEC Email energyclub@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Well this escalated quickly!

    All the routers being used as access points have been given static IPs on the LAN (172.16.0.x) and are set up as DHCP relays so as not to cause IP conflicts; I left that info out of the OP because I thought it was always the case with APs

    I think I'm going to leave it as seperate zones, but thanks for the advice.
  • John_Gray
    John_Gray Posts: 5,847 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    So long as it works for you, that is good!
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    DavidP24 wrote: »
    All answers above are wrong.

    Pretty sure I'm the exception to prove the rule ;-) I've installed Cloudtrax mesh AP's even in places without Ethernet on some hops -very fast and simple to install and self-managing ;-)
  • AndyPix
    AndyPix Posts: 4,847 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Your actual dhcp server (usually the domain controller) should be handling dhcp ..
    Seperate the guest wifi using vlan.


    For what you wand , you are best off getting your comapny to put its hand in its pocket and but some propper access points designed for the job.


    We did use Dlink dwl-3600AP's but have recently made the move to Meraki mr34 cloud managed AP's and they are an absolute pleasure to administer.


    In fact, were not using the Dlink ones anymore - you can have them if you want them
    PM me
  • We use the Apple Express points, they cost us about £30 off ebay and we set them up as a new wireless network and give them the same SSID, password and channel. Really easy and seems to roam nicely. We do use mainly PC's here, but bought Apple due to easy use
  • John_Gray
    John_Gray Posts: 5,847 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    rhysadams wrote: »
    we set them up as a new wireless network and give them the same SSID, password and channel.
    Transmitting on the same channel would give a high chance of interference between 'adjacent' Apple Express points. Using non-overlapping channels would probably give better results, IMNVHO...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.