We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interest-only mortgages expiring
Options
Comments
-
...or who don't want to compromise on other outgoings - shiny new cars, holidays, consumer bling...0
-
Didn't Martin say that having an interest only mortgage is liking paying rent to a mortgage company ?0
-
gettingtheresometime wrote: »Didn't Martin say that having an interest only mortgage is liking paying rent to a mortgage company ?0
-
Blame the electorate's short-term thinking and NIMBYism for that.
How many places have you been to or through with loads of signs up saying things like "NO TO 1,000 NEW HOUSES!", "NO TO DEVELOPERS RUINING OUR TOWN!"?
How many of those developments make even a pretence at including enough infrastructure, roads, schools etc?0 -
I think there is a mix of people who genuinely have no choice but to get a 40yo mortgage to just get on the ladder, but it can't be denied that there are also many families who want their dream house beyond their need, ie. a room for each child even when close in age/same sex, and are choosing to take on a 40y mortgage to be able to pay for it.
Slightly away from topic but on theme above - Spoke to 82yo mum yesterday about growing up during the war. Her mum and dad rented 2bed council house for a family of 5 daughters and mum and dad! Across the road a family of mum and dad and 12 children rented same size council house! Can you imagine anyone being able/allowed to do that today?0 -
Rosemary7391 wrote: »How many of those developments make even a pretence at including enough infrastructure, roads, schools etc?
You have the same protests overtime you try to build a realistically-sized road.
Schools (and roads) are the council/government's responsibility.0 -
Getting back to the point of this post, it was painful listening to someone who is so willfully stupid.
Even when, as the interviewer asked "it says here in bold letters in the second line of the letter that you need to make arrangements to pay off the mortgage did you not understand that?" she evaded the question with, and I paraphrase "oh well i thought it would be OK when it ended and they'd let me off needing to pay it back".
The other irritating thing was that apparently being 70 and paying your mortgage on time is regarded a general get out. Great, I'll be scot free soon as well then.0 -
Rosemary7391 wrote: »How many of those developments make even a pretence at including enough infrastructure, roads, schools etc?Miss_Samantha wrote: »Schools (and roads) are the council/government's responsibility.
But typically with the developers contributing towards the cost as part of the planning process.0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »You have the same protests overtime you try to build a realistically-sized road.
Schools (and roads) are the council/government's responsibility.
Not entirely.
Roads on new developments are built by developers to a specification agreed with the local authority. Developers will want to minimise the scale of expense on roads and it is in their interest to minimise traffic-flow projections and other specifications. They are able to throw cash at expert reports that are difficult for a Council to refute, without being seen as unreasonably delaying occupation of much-needed homes.
For new developments, new schools (or expansion of existing schools) are partly paid for by developer contributions. Again there is a process of negotiation and a test of "reasonableness", which may not go in the local authority's favour. Even if a development makes a reasonable contribution to new school provision, it is very unusual for this to cover the total costs of construction/expansion, so the balance needs to be met from the Council's capital - in competition with a range of other much-needed projects.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards