📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Executor

2

Comments

  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I would like to do it for her, she has not been treated well in life and we have got to know her these last few years. She is a feisty old lady and I am honoured to be asked.

    You could just agree to do it as it will reassure her, but when it happens simply offer one of the charites concerned the opportunity to chose a solicitor to execute the will.

    Being named as executor is not a legal obligation to act.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • iammumtoone
    iammumtoone Posts: 6,377 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    How about agreeing to it but making sure she is aware that depending on when the time comes you will act if you are still able but if your circumstances have changed and you no longer have time to deal with it, you will be passing it onto a solicitor. That way she will be aware that it is a possibility so you won't feel bad if you have to pass it over.

    I am named as an executor I am almost certain I will not be doing it but I am still glad I am named as it will leave me the choice rather than it being taken out of my hands.

    If she names a solicitor there is no going back but if she names a person the choice is left open.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    .

    If she names a solicitor there is no going back but if she names a person the choice is left open.

    I do not see the distinction, either can be reversed or renounced. If you mean a solicitor is unlikely to renounce it, that depends on the value of the estate.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • iammumtoone
    iammumtoone Posts: 6,377 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    BobQ wrote: »
    I do not see the distinction, either can be reversed or renounced. If you mean a solicitor is unlikely to renounce it, that depends on the value of the estate.

    I suppose what I mean is it would be more difficult for SDW to take over the job from a solicitor than it would be the other way round.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,172 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When we were making our Wills, our solicitor advised us that we should allocate £s per charity, not a percentage of our estate.

    Seems that when charities are left a %, they do all they can to maximise their 'share' even if it means refusing any offers for the property/assets if they feel if they can get more. The estate can't be finalised while all this is going on, so any other bequests can't be paid out either.
  • When we were making our Wills, our solicitor advised us that we should allocate £s per charity, not a percentage of our estate.

    Seems that when charities are left a %, they do all they can to maximise their 'share' even if it means refusing any offers for the property/assets if they feel if they can get more. The estate can't be finalised while all this is going on, so any other bequests can't be paid out either.

    AFAIK, there are no more bequests, it is all divided between two charities.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • BobQ wrote: »
    You could just agree to do it as it will reassure her, but when it happens simply offer one of the charites concerned the opportunity to chose a solicitor to execute the will.

    Being named as executor is not a legal obligation to act.
    Very deceitful though.
  • Very deceitful though.

    I would not do that unless I found myself for some reason unable to act. If I say I will be her executor, I will do it.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Very deceitful though.

    I think that is a little harsh. If the testator is sensible they would respond to an argument that, if you leave money to charities, they can cause the executor a lot of hassle through aggressively interfering.

    If the testator does not trust solicitors I would say its being practical.

    The honest position is either not to do the job or to accept the hassle.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When we were making our Wills, our solicitor advised us that we should allocate £s per charity, not a percentage of our estate.

    Seems that when charities are left a %, they do all they can to maximise their 'share' even if it means refusing any offers for the property/assets if they feel if they can get more. The estate can't be finalised while all this is going on, so any other bequests can't be paid out either.

    The charities may indeed take that view but the wisdom of £ vs % depends on circumstances. Say you have £100K and make a will leaving £30K to a charity and the rest to a beneficiary. Say when you die your estate is worth £40K that means most of the estate goes to charity which may not be what you want.

    Some solicitors love advising testators to use cash values: it encourages you to update your will more frequently :)
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.