We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Joint ownership for BLT split

I'm planning to invest in a BTL property.
The decision I want make is - whether the property should be bought as joint owner or sole on my wife name?

Let me explain the use case better. I'm on higher tax bracket and my wife is on standard tax bracket. We expect the rental income to be £1000/- per month so £12k per year. If I deduct £1k/- as expences then the net income would be £11k/-.

Now if I add this income to her employment income then total income would be few grands over the standard tax rate hence I was tinking of property as joint.

So finally, what seems sensible to me is to split the ownership share between me and my wife as 25:75. so she get advantage of lower tax bracket and also later on when we sell the property and get any capital gains then can split profit and get any capital gains tax relief advantage.

Do you see any issue with this plan? and if it is possible to buy propery in such joint ownership way?
Do you see any issue with taking mortgage given that we have 25% deposit available jointly?

Thanks
«1

Comments

  • fishpond
    fishpond Posts: 1,022 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    How much do you trust your wife?
    I am a LandLord,(under review) so there!:p
  • I trust her 100%.
  • I'm glad you clarified that you're referring to a Buy To Let property. From the thread title I thought this was joint ownership of a Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato sandwich.
    "The problem with Internet quotes is that you can't always depend on their accuracy" - Abraham Lincoln, 1864
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    rahulbuyer wrote: »
    I'm planning to invest in a BTL property. Good luck,you do realise the implications yes?
    The decision I want make is - whether the property should be bought as joint owner or sole on my wife name? Does your wife on her own meet the lenders criteria ?

    Let me explain the use case better. I'm on higher tax bracket and my wife is on standard tax bracket. We expect the rental income to be £1000/- per month so £12k per year. If I deduct £1k/- as expences then the net income would be £11k/-.
    £1K? What about your solicitor costs etc?

    Now if I add this income to her employment income then total income would be few grands over the standard tax rate hence I was tinking of property as joint.

    So finally, what seems sensible to me is to split the ownership share between me and my wife as 25:75. so she get advantage of lower tax bracket and also later on when we sell the property and get any capital gains then can split profit and get any capital gains tax relief advantage. Not going to happen

    Do you see any issue with this plan? and if it is possible to buy propery in such joint ownership way?
    Do you see any issue with taking mortgage given that we have 25% deposit available jointly? Yes, plenty.

    Thanks

    I'm no tax expert but what i do know is HMRC are actually no mugs.
  • nubbins
    nubbins Posts: 725 Forumite
    Ignore the ballax above, declaration of trust and form 17 and a 99:1 split if you wish. You can do this yourself using a template and sending together with the form 17 to your local tax office. I would get a few hours expert tax advice if I was you.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-declaration-of-beneficial-interests-in-joint-property-and-income-17
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    rahulbuyer wrote: »
    Let me explain the use case better. I'm on higher tax bracket and my wife is on standard tax bracket. We expect the rental income to be £1000/- per month so £12k per year. If I deduct £1k/- as expences then the net income would be £11k/-.

    Now if I add this income to her employment income then total income would be few grands over the standard tax rate hence I was tinking of property as joint.
    so you are higher rate taxpayer and she is standard

    if the rental income takes her over the standard rate then surely that means you are both higher rate so the split is irrelevant - your post is somewhat confusing?
    rahulbuyer wrote: »
    So finally, what seems sensible to me is to split the ownership share between me and my wife as 25:75. so she get advantage of lower tax bracket and also later on when we sell the property and get any capital gains then can split profit and get any capital gains tax relief advantage.
    as you are married you can transfer ownership between the 2 of you any time you want without triggering a CGT liability. However, you are correct that at the time you finally sell it then yes if you both own it you both have your personal allowances to offset any tax due on your respective share of the gain.

    As the property is not your main home worry about eventual CGT is irrelevant at the point of purchase since you can always make her an owner later. Focus on the income tax exposure at this stage, not the CGT exposure
    rahulbuyer wrote: »
    Do you see any issue with this plan? and if it is possible to buy propery in such joint ownership way?
    Do you see any issue with taking mortgage given that we have 25% deposit available jointly?
    of course you can buy jointly, but only if you both meet whatever lending criteria conditions are imposed - assuming you need a mortgage to fund the purchase
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'm glad you clarified that you're referring to a Buy To Let property. From the thread title I thought this was joint ownership of a Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato sandwich.

    It's lunchtime and I was thinking of the bacon lettuce Tomato sandwich too lol
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • Sorry for the typo :o. Yes I meant "Buy to Let" Property
  • nubbins wrote: »
    Ignore the ballax above, declaration of trust and form 17 and a 99:1 split if you wish. You can do this yourself using a template and sending together with the form 17 to your local tax office. I would get a few hours expert tax advice if I was you.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-declaration-of-beneficial-interests-in-joint-property-and-income-17

    This is great. Thanks for the information
  • booksurr wrote: »
    so you are higher rate taxpayer and she is standard

    if the rental income takes her over the standard rate then surely that means you are both higher rate so the split is irrelevant - your post is somewhat confusing?

    as you are married you can transfer ownership between the 2 of you any time you want without triggering a CGT liability. However, you are correct that at the time you finally sell it then yes if you both own it you both have your personal allowances to offset any tax due on your respective share of the gain.

    As the property is not your main home worry about eventual CGT is irrelevant at the point of purchase since you can always make her an owner later. Focus on the income tax exposure at this stage, not the CGT exposure
    of course you can buy jointly, but only if you both meet whatever lending criteria conditions are imposed - assuming you need a mortgage to fund the purchase
    Thanks for the detailed reply
    so you are higher rate taxpayer and she is standard

    if the rental income takes her over the standard rate then surely that means you are both higher rate so the split is irrelevant - your post is somewhat confusing?

    Yes the rental income would take her to higher rate however still she can use the £10k/- that is left on standard rate. no? And also if we split the ownership then she will remain on standard rate
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.