Michael Schartz

pappa_golf

sorry I missed .co.uk off that , yup he was *issed and insists that all complaints have to go thru SRA complaints , where he will not get to see them


after listening to talk that was being moved from the question ,he finally agreed that "claimants legal representative" could be seen to be a solicitor , however there will have to be a full 5 yr formal enquiry to check this out


what chance with the B+W?




do you know that Swartz can go working for isis , and they cannot do anything , because isis is not regulated by the SRA

Milsey

In which case I shall happily scan in our form and pop him an email "for reference" if he won't get to see anything going through the complaints department

henrik777

pappa_golf wrote: »

after listening to talk that was being moved from the question ,he finally agreed that "claimants legal representative" could be seen to be a solicitor , however there will have to be a full 5 yr formal enquiry to check this out

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part02#2.3

‘legal representative’ means a –
(a) barrister;
(b) solicitor;
(c) solicitor’s employee;
(d) manager of a body recognised under section 9 of the Administration of Justice Act 19859; or
(e) person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 200710, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the conduct of litigation (within the meaning of that Act),
who has been instructed to act for a party in relation to proceedings;

pappa_golf

yes I clearly quoted at least 3 of the above , but met with a brick wall


I can tell you , Swartz WILL continue for a LONG time before the SRA do anything , if in deed they do