UKPC - you've been Gladstoned

parkingwoes_2

beamerguy wrote: »

pappa, it seems that thursday night is wind up time ?

Pointless getting involved in a pointless conversation

Question time on the BBC is on shortly, much more interesting

Not sure where the wind up is...

PG asked "Have you met him"

Seems you recognise the pointless comments you and PG have made on this thread already then:rotfl:

Better let you keyboard anonymous warriors do what you do best and leave the real work to professionals like those mentioned in Parking Prankster's blogs

pappa_golf

parkingwoes wrote: »

Not sure where the wind up is...

PG asked "Have you met him"

Seems you recognise the pointless comments you and PG have made on this thread already then:rotfl:

Better let you keyboard anonymous warriors do what you do best and leave the real work to professionals

do you represent a company , you give that impression

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

do you represent a company , you give that impression

pappa ... do yourself a favour, you are too good to be involved so just ignore.

Anyway, Question Time is on, so watch REAL people slag each other off .... not forum user names.

parkingwoes_2

beamerguy wrote: »

pappa ... do yourself a favour, you are too good to be involved so just ignore.

Anyway, Question Time is on, so watch REAL people slag each other off .... not forum user names.

Good idea - time to practice what you appear to be preaching Beamer Guy, rather than let this thread fall into attacks against forum users

Don't see why my post before was 'attacked again' as was not insulting in any way..

However it is no wonder forum regulars have left or been driven out (PPRd) by the venomous postings by others over the years..

pappa_golf

my uncle used to work for TV licencing many years ago , but we don't hold it against him now :rotfl:

Coupon-mad

pappa_golf wrote: »

do you represent a company , you give that impression

Oh, she's back is she? That person didn't write the Blog, it's not in her style any more than the Prankster's.

Blogs written by someone else just never read quite the same; very transparently that was not written in the usual down to earth honest style of the Parking Prankster.

Any inaccurate stuff that gets through in 'guest blogs' like that is a huge shame and embarrassment really. For example, 'Hoax phone call gate' from back in the day, was swallowed hook line and sinker by...oooh let's count 'em...maybe by now there may still be one or two people left among the regulars who actually believe that old chestnut happened as reported. The rest don't care but most never believed it at all, except the person who spouted it and (probably) his side-kick.

Wrong information and 'look at me' propaganda should not make it into a Blog; such stuff does nothing to help the credibility of all the good people in this fight v the PPCs. Sadly, there are some people who can't see that and have other personal agendas.

When they pop up on forums I've blocked them anyway but I do see any quote.

Moving on...I have some POPLA appeals to write for people and a defence for another.

pappa_golf wrote: »

my uncle used to work for TV licencing many years ago , but we don't hold it against him now :rotfl:

To quote a contact again whose sentiments I wholeheartedly agree with:

'' Good people resign when they notice who they got involved with. ''

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

my uncle used to work for TV licencing many years ago , but we don't hold it against him now :rotfl:

PAPPA .... STOP .... Wind ups only continue if you feed the wind ups

There is better rubbish on Question time right now

beamerguy

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Oh, she's back is she? That person didn't write the Blog, it's not in her style any more than the Prankster's.

C-m don't get involved, we all know

IGNORE - IGNORE - IGNORE as we all say about DRP

beamerguy

YAWN, this is becoming such a boring thread

Let's focus on the title of this thread

UKPC - you've been Gladstoned

TDA

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Some inaccuracies; makes some here wonder who wrote that.

Interesting.

What were the inaccuracies?