We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rent out parking lot in lease hold property
Options
Comments
-
Moving a partner in or even getting a lodger are not subletting as there is no lease. A lodger stays under license and a partner is a member of your household.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
-
Just to clarify, it seems that...
- You have bought a leasehold apartment with no allocated parking space.
- You now have the opportunity to buy a parking space - presumably on a separate lease.
It sounds like you are quoting from the lease of the apartment - which has no allocated parking space.
So why is a parking space marked in blue on the lease?0 -
I cannot give you the literal description right now, but the Premises mention the apartment itself, with its elements (windows, etc) and market in red.
Right, so not "the flat + parking lot" you said a few minutes ago? As above, are you sure the parking space is going to be included in the same lease rather than a separate one?Maybe here is the catch, that I must sublet the Premises (flat) to dispose the right to park?0 -
Right, so not "the flat + parking lot" you said a few minutes ago? As above, are you sure the parking space is going to be included in the same lease rather than a separate one?
Yes, you are right. I made a mistake there and I edited the comment to clarify it. Thank you for pointing it out.Paragraph 3 effectively prohibits you subletting or selling the parking space to anyone other than a tenant (or owner) of the flat. But it says "subject to" the previous paragraphs, and para 1 allows you to sublet the parking space provided you get consent. Which can't be unreasonably withheld. I have no idea whether there is any precedent about what "reasonable" objections might be, but perhaps they could argue that only occupiers of flats in your block ought to be able to use the car park?
That is interesting. So you think that clause 3 is not a categorical denial due to the "subject to", and that the same rules apply as per paragraph 1?
On the other hand Paragraph 1 says that I can ask for permission to sublet the only the Premises (flat), but not ask to sublet the Allocated Space (parking).0 -
Just to clarify, it seems that...
- You have bought a leasehold apartment with no allocated parking space.
- You now have the opportunity to buy a parking space - presumably on a separate lease.
It sounds like you are quoting from the lease of the apartment - which has no allocated parking space.
So why is a parking space marked in blue on the lease?
I got a deed of variation that changes the definition of "Allocated Space". The Premises refers to the flat and the "Allocated space" is the parking. In the Deed of Variation I get right to use the Allocated Space. I guess that is why they have a different colour.
Also, when I said "buy a parking lot" I guess that actually I am paying for getting the grant to use the Allocated Space.0 -
So you think that clause 3 is not a categorical denial due to the "subject to", and that the same rules apply as per paragraph 1?
"Subject to" means that paragraphs 1 and 2 are exceptions to the general rule of paragraph 3.
Actually on thinking about it again paragraph 1 doesn't help you if the parking space isn't part of the Premises. So as currently worded, no, you can't sell or sublet the parking space to anyone other than a tenant or owner of the flat.
Not the best worded clause!0 -
"Subject to" means that paragraphs 1 and 2 are exceptions to the general rule of paragraph 3.
Actually on thinking about it again paragraph 1 doesn't help you if the parking space isn't part of the Premises. So as currently worded, no, you can't sell or sublet the parking space to anyone other than a tenant or owner of the flat.
Not the best worded clause!
Thank you, you did help me understanding these clauses.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards