We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Natwest - First reply to initial request

Sophieb_2
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi All,
New to the forum - but hope you can help.
I recently contacted Natwest using the MSE advice and requested information of all charges on my account, enclosing the fee of £10.
I received a reply yesterday requesting/ stating the following.
1: My signature does not match their records (I need to go into a branch with my passport or driving license) and also send them a hard copy.
2: That the purpose of my request is unclear - and that I need to call them to discuss the information that I am looking for.
I sense that this is an attempt to prolong and hinder the process. Has anyone else experienced similar? Upon calling them is it best to say that I would like a list of all charges on my account?
Currently have £5000 debt that I am slowly tackling. Would really appreciate any advice.
With thanks
Sophie
New to the forum - but hope you can help.
I recently contacted Natwest using the MSE advice and requested information of all charges on my account, enclosing the fee of £10.
I received a reply yesterday requesting/ stating the following.
1: My signature does not match their records (I need to go into a branch with my passport or driving license) and also send them a hard copy.
2: That the purpose of my request is unclear - and that I need to call them to discuss the information that I am looking for.
I sense that this is an attempt to prolong and hinder the process. Has anyone else experienced similar? Upon calling them is it best to say that I would like a list of all charges on my account?
Currently have £5000 debt that I am slowly tackling. Would really appreciate any advice.
With thanks
Sophie
0
Comments
-
1. may be true.
2. maybe you didn't request dates in your request?
But essentially if you are in current financial hardship, you may be able to reclaim recent bank charges (especially if they're contributing to the situation).Please be polite to OPs and remember this is a site for Claimants and Appellants to seek redress against their bank, ex-boss or retailer. If they wanted morality or the view of the IoD or Bank they'd ask them.0 -
Your request is unclear, are you asking for details of charges they have actually levied on your account or are you asking for their tariff of charges ie details of their fees although you may not paid any of those fees. You need to make it clear what you want and for what dates.
Please remember you cannot just "claim back" historical charges that were correctly applied for not running your account properly eg bounced DD, exceeding overdraft fees etc. - as Mersey alludes to, if you are in current genuine financial hardship you can ask the bank for a goodwill gesture though the form that this might take is at the discretion of the bank. Since the banks won the court case on bank charges you are not going to get back years of charges unless they were incorrectly applied.
If you are actually referring to charges for a packaged bank account that you believe was miss sold to you, just send in a complaint with your complaint reasons.
They are not trying to hinder you or prolong the process they are just wanting to clarify what it is you want and why, in order to deal with it correctly0 -
Doing a DSAR for a list of all your charges was, sadly, a waste of £10, you will never get back historical charges, the court ruling in 2009 established the fees were fair and correctly applied.
If you are in current financial hardship you should simply have spoken to the hardship team at the bank about your situation and they can apply one (or more) of several approaches to help you get out of a spiral of debt such as refunding up to 6 months of recent charges or freezing future charges to help you get out of the cycle.
Banks will look at your spending habits and if you are in genuine hardship (not spending on eating out, expensive mobile bills, Sky TV etc) then they will help
See below link
http://personal.natwest.com/personal/life-moments/Struggling-financially.htmlSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards