📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Jointly Owned Property- Care Home Fees

Options
Hi,

I appreciate this is a little vague but if anyone could assist that would be fantastic.

My parents (both late 50's) own 50% of a house with my Grandma owning the other 50%. They all lived in this house until my Grandma moved permanently to a care home.

If it is decided that my Grandma's share of the house needs to be used to pay for care (still tbc), can my parents be forced to move out and sell the house? Or can a charge be put on the property until they decide to sell.

Essentially- can they at any point be forced to sell the property against their will to pay for the care home?

Many thanks.

Comments

  • I don't think anyone can give a definitive answer here, because it is not street forward. If you parents were in their 60's the house would be disregarded but that is not the case, although the LA still have discretion to disregard in this type of case.

    A forced sale would need to go through the courts so even if the council tried to do this it might fall down there.
  • I don't think anyone can give a definitive answer here, because it is not street forward. If you parents were in their 60's the house would be disregarded but that is not the case, although the LA still have discretion to disregard in this type of case.

    A forced sale would need to go through the courts so even if the council tried to do this it might fall down there.

    Thank you for your reply, I appreciate I asked a nearly impossible to answer question.

    They have been given so much conflicting information from the social workers, solicitors (even the various solicitors they speak to can't agree) and charities such as Age UK. It seems like it is a minefield of legislation and the law is liable to interpretation with lots of grey areas.

    My main concern is that I really don't want my parents to be in a position where they are forced to sell their home. An already terribly sad situation with my Grandma, is now also fraught with stress.

    Thank you again.
  • I think this sort of case is quite a rare, if your parents owned half the house but we're living else where then it would be staight forward.

    How near their 60th birthday is you oldest parent? Does your grandmother have any other assets to pay for her care?

    Do they have the means to buy out your GMs share of the house?
  • greyfox
    greyfox Posts: 484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    edited 30 September 2016 at 11:22AM
    This situation isn't that unusual, in fact.

    The first thing to be aware of is that the value of a half share in a property isn't the same as half the value of the whole property. Unfortunately, the LAs tend to "forget" this when they do the assessment. If they've just used half the value in the assessment (or, even worse, just told your Grandmother/parents that they can't help because of the property, without doing an actual assessment) there are grounds for a challenge. In some cases, the share has little or no actual value as no-one would be willing to buy it.

    There's an Age Uk factsheet here http://www.ageuk.org.uk/documents/en-gb/factsheets/fs38_treatment_of_property_in_the_means-test_for_permanent_care_home_provision_fcs.pdf?dtrk=true
    The section on jointly-owned property is about a third of the way down.

    There was an article in the Guardian a few years ago which explains things in plainer English! (The rules haven't changed since). https://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/may/25/jointly-owned-home-sold-care

    Hope this helps
  • Rosy_Apple
    Rosy_Apple Posts: 152 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 30 September 2016 at 3:19PM
    greyfox wrote: »
    This situation isn't that unusual, in fact.

    .

    .
  • Well, I've searched the UK Parliament site & can't find any amendments to the Charging Regulations. The current version is the 2014 set here http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2672/pdfs/uksi_20142672_en.pdf

    jointly-owned property is at regulation 24

    There is provision for property to be treated as owned in equal shares unless there is evidence to the contrary but nothing about giving a share an unreal value. (Many, many years ago – I’m talking 20 or 30 - there had been an attempt to do this in the regulations but it was thrown out as unlawful.)

    The current version of the guidance which the Social Workers should be following (known as CRAG) is here
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/301250/CRAG_34_April_2014.pdf
    paras 7.017-7.020

    I've had a look for any amendments to that, too, but none found.

    I can only suggest that you call the Social Worker's bluff. Quote the relevant bits of law & CRAG to her & ask her to quote chapter & verse of the "change to the rules".

    Good luck.
  • Rosy_Apple wrote: »
    They will both be 60 in 2018, the first birthday being in June. They have already been told that the house is not being disregarded.

    My Grandmother has money c.£20k in her bank account but that would be it. Unfortunately my parents don't have the means to buy her out. They spent a fair amount of money to adapt the house when they bought half, including some safeguarding for my Grandmother.

    The original idea was that they bought the other person who lived there out so they could care for my Grandmother and prevent her having to go into a care home. Unfortunately, her Dementia has reached a point that has made that impossible.

    Thank you again.

    Could they raise a mortgage to buy her out or sell the house (if required) and downsize to something smaller?
  • greyfox wrote: »
    Well, I've searched the UK Parliament site & can't find any amendments to the Charging Regulations. The current version is the 2014 set here http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2672/pdfs/uksi_20142672_en.pdf

    jointly-owned property is at regulation 24

    There is provision for property to be treated as owned in equal shares unless there is evidence to the contrary but nothing about giving a share an unreal value. (Many, many years ago – I’m talking 20 or 30 - there had been an attempt to do this in the regulations but it was thrown out as unlawful.)

    The current version of the guidance which the Social Workers should be following (known as CRAG) is here
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/301250/CRAG_34_April_2014.pdf
    paras 7.017-7.020

    I've had a look for any amendments to that, too, but none found.

    I can only suggest that you call the Social Worker's bluff. Quote the relevant bits of law & CRAG to her & ask her to quote chapter & verse of the "change to the rules".

    Good luck.

    Thank you so much for taking the time to help me. I shall have a look at this and suggest my parents talk with the social worker again.

    Thanks again.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.