We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should you pay a call-out charge when...

dac1
Posts: 22 Forumite
Not sure where to post this.
I arranged a boiler service a week in advance. When making the appointment the only info asked/given was the boiler is in the loft. The guy turns up and says as you don't have adequate lighting or floor boards so I cannot provide the service due to regulations.
He requests a £30 call-out charge for the hour return trip he has made.
a) was he correct that he cannot service the boiler due to regulations?
b) was he correct to request the call-out charge?
I arranged a boiler service a week in advance. When making the appointment the only info asked/given was the boiler is in the loft. The guy turns up and says as you don't have adequate lighting or floor boards so I cannot provide the service due to regulations.
He requests a £30 call-out charge for the hour return trip he has made.
a) was he correct that he cannot service the boiler due to regulations?
b) was he correct to request the call-out charge?
0
Comments
-
Just to clarify... the company asked 'is the boiler in the loft' and you said 'yes'. Did they ask anything further, like 'is the loft boarded/accessible'?
Mind you, it does sound like something you should have told them. If the loft isn't boarded, they do run the risk of falling through your ceiling! And without light... well, yes, you would expect to have a light up there.
I'd be inclined to kick up a fuss and speak with a manager - but would probably feel a tad sheepish inside.
Jx2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0 -
Did he say whose regulations...? They may very well be his employer's regulations. They certainly sound like basic common sense.
Personally, I don't think it unfair at all for him to charge for the wasted trip caused by you expecting him to grommit around in a loft by torch with a risk of going through the ceiling... Get it boarded and a light installed!0 -
By law his employer will have been required to produce a RAMS.
Whether you are at fault for not providing the information or they for not asking more questions is a pretty grey area.0 -
It's ok. Just interested to know. We intend to have the boarding/light put inplace. Thanks.0
-
Is this the first time you've had the boiler serviced? If not, how did you overcome the lack of floor and light previously?0
-
It's not against regulations to have the boiler in the loft...well it wasnt 3 years ago when mine was put in the loft.
No I wouldn't pay the call out charge.0 -
bobbymotors wrote: »It's not against regulations to have the boiler in the loft...0
-
It would be against some sort of health and safety regulation to work in a loft without a crawling board or two, and how is he going to service the boiler without a work light. If you knew that was the condition in the loft then either ask whoever is coming out can they do it - have they got suitable boards and lights - or you provide them. I'd say the charge is perfectly reasonable.Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.0
-
I think it would be against the Work at Height Regulations for working on fragile surfaces, and general H&S regulations for the lack of lighting.
Although the fragile surfaces working is the biggie IMO0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards