We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tenants in common/joint ownership

2»

Comments

  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 5,774 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As you can see there's a few ways you could go - I thought I'd outline some of the 'pros and cons' I can see for each.

    1) Father lends you money and you become his landlord
    - PROs: You benefit fully from price increases/decreases; rental income if father pays rent
    - CONs: Landlord obligations of deposits, PI, repairs, tax on rental income; may need to liquidate if father needs to extract his money for e.g. care; no income until you sell if father doesn't pay rent

    2) Tenants in Common (i.e. own shares)
    - PROs: Each benefit from price increases/decreases fairly
    - CONs: may need to liquidate if father needs to extract his money for e.g. care; no income until you sell if father doesn't pay rent

    3) Lend money to your father to buy outright
    - PROs: no higher SLDT for second home; no Landlord obligations/formalities; you get your money back if he has to sell/go into care
    - CONs: you don't benefit from any property price increase (or decrease). Your father could pay you interest to offset this but will he have the cash for that?

    To me, 1) makes the least sense as you have the same pitfalls as 2) plus the landlord complications. I'd do 3) with the caveat that the loan is for a percentage of the house value, so its a proper investment with exposure to house value change, while if the value goes down your father can't go into negative equity.
  • Thank you all
  • staro30
    staro30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thanks Saajan_12 for the options and recommendation. Happy to lend my father some money and get him to agree to pay it back with interest, if the house value increases, but what is the best option for this agreement as I am concerned that, if according to the LR he owns the house outright, then if he has to go into care then I may have no remit to get my investment back? So do I:
    1. Write up something informal between ourselves. No legal basis though?
    2. Apply for 'first charge' on the property. Which LR form is this?
    3. Use a solicitor to write up a 'trust deed'. Would prefer not to do this due to solicitor costs on an investment likely to be about 20k.


    Thanks
    Staro
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    See post 11 above - I repeat, in your position I would not dispense with the services of a solicitor.
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    saajan_12 wrote: »
    1) Father lends you money and you become his landlord
    - PROs: You benefit fully from price increases/decreases; rental income if father pays rent
    - CONs: Landlord obligations of deposits, PI, repairs, tax on rental income; may need to liquidate if father needs to extract his money for e.g. care; no income until you sell if father doesn't pay rent
    if father "lends" son money for a property the father then occupies himself, the father would need to pay son full market rent otherwise the father would be liable for income tax on the benefit in kind he gets under the Pre Owned Asset tax rule
    staro30 wrote: »
    but what is the best option for this agreement as I am concerned that, if according to the LR he owns the house outright, then if he has to go into care then I may have no remit to get my investment back?
    you have already been given the answer to that (twice!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.