We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Sell or let to buy

2»

Comments

  • wolfplayer wrote: »
    Can't wait for all the BTLers to begin saying hello to Section24.

    That seems a little hostile. :smileyhea:smileyhea

    /goes back to agonising over the ethical implications of owning a second home :grouphug:
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    No worries, Hoploz! :cool:



    That makes a lot more sense, AdrianC :rotfl:



    We would probably use an agency. My sister's been letting a flat for 16 years and not had that problem.

    I'm more concerned about whether this is the right property to be investing in. It's always going to go up in value more slowly than others in the area because it's ex-local authority. Weighing that up with moving costs, and what we can afford to buy.



    I guess the point is that the BTL mortagage should be the smaller one? We would need to release some of the equity to fund the new purchase.

    Not sure what an agent has to do with it?

    Circumstances can change for everyone. I know someone who's suffered a stroke in his mid 40's, his earning potential is significantly reduced now- he was well over 70k a year.

    My question was important as if you can't afford to be without income for that period, you risk losing it all.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    That seems a little hostile. :smileyhea:smileyhea

    NAHAY?
    /goes back to agonising over the ethical implications of owning a second home :grouphug:
    Woah! Stop there. Yes, RIGHT there... One major detail you've forgotten. This will not be your second home. This will be somebody else's one and only home. You will own two properties, but only one will be your home. The other is a business investment. No more than that. You have to break all emotional involvement in it, otherwise you WILL go mad. Renting a property out is a business activity, with the primary intent of making you an income. The best way to maximise that income is to ensure that your customer - your tenant - is happy, because then you won't have unpaid rent and voids. Some of the long-term income from your business is from capital growth over time, sure, but don't forget the effects of inflation and the lost-opportunity costs, especially if it means you incur interest charges elsewhere.
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The best way to maximise that income is to ensure that your customer - your tenant - is happy, because then you won't have unpaid rent and voids
    How convenient! Found that not be the case on the opposite and that the best way is to be choosy over who your customer is, not full proof, but certainly minimising the risks.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    FBaby wrote: »
    The best way to maximise that income is to ensure that your customer - your tenant - is happy, because then you won't have unpaid rent and voids
    How convenient! Found that not be the case on the opposite and that the best way is to be choosy over who your customer is, not full proof, but certainly minimising the risks.
    I think you're agreeing with me. That's certainly one of the other benefits of ensuring a good tenant is happy - you don't have to play tenant-roulette as often.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.