We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

One house or more, what would you do?

If you had 100k what is the best option for using your money:

1. buy one property with 50% equity to live in

2. Put 50k down on two properties (25% on each) live in one and rent the other out?
«1

Comments

  • What's 'best' depends on what you want.
    Do you want to be a landlord?
  • Alice2708
    Alice2708 Posts: 12 Forumite
    edited 7 September 2016 at 12:57PM
    Don't forget if you own more than one property you will be subject to the higher stamp duty cost
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    If you had 100k what is the best option for using your money:

    1. buy one property with 50% equity to live in

    2. Put 50k down on two properties (25% on each) live in one and rent the other out?

    Given you're user name, both options seem to be counter productive
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You'd need a buy to let mortgage. You can invest in property via funds instead, then you won't have the responsibility or second mortgage, or better still, a shares fund, then you'll perform better and not be overexposed to property
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Spend it on mistress/toy-boy (both?) , alcohol, fine dining
  • How do I invest in property via shares and what is a shares fund? Do I get a regular income from this as I would with monthly rent and is the capital safe?
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    How do I invest in property via shares and what is a shares fund? Do I get a regular income from this as I would with monthly rent and is the capital safe?

    Employ a financial adviser.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Want2bemortgagefree -
    .How do I invest in property via shares and what is a shares fund? Do I get a regular income from this as I would with monthly rent and is the capital safe?

    Mutual funds pool lots of people's money together and invest in shares, property, bonds, etc - and you own shares in the find itself rather than in individual companies. They allow you to achieve more diversity at less commission than you could achieve holding shares yourself but charge an annual management fee in exchange, of anything from 0.09%-2%+ of the entire balance, which you pay whether you make profit or loss. They are safer and more balanced than just piling it all into a handful of stocks yourself.

    If you look in the morningstar or ii websites for example you'll see there are property funds among them, usually commercial property (shops, warehouses, etc) - residential ones do exist but they're harder

    Personally I think property is far harder work than shares and far less liquid, a property fund will probably have higher management fees.

    For shares I recommend just tracking an index like the FTSE all share, rather than going for active managers - index trackers are cheaper and beat most managers

    Yes, funds can provide income, though this under performs compared to accumulation funds, which reinvest your dividends/rent

    I don't know if property funds are leveraged, if they're not then they might not outperform buy to let, still though they would be isa-able so better tax wise and less risky if you had a bad Tennant or vacant period
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    And no, capital not safe, that's the nature of investing. They're not going to rip you off fraudulently but you will be exposed to downs as well as ups, just like with house prices, though as long as you don't sell in a crash and just wait it out, you'll usually do far better than cash.

    Remember the jobs market isn't safe either and is less diversifiable than shares

    And if you hold in cash you're guaranteed to lose against house prices

    Some people rent & invest rather than buy, but I disagree with that, as a mortgage let's you invest with borrowed money
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • slowpoke_rodriguez
    slowpoke_rodriguez Posts: 307 Forumite
    edited 7 September 2016 at 8:27PM
    The share price of Grainger, one of the larger residential Landlords.
    As you can see, There's money to be made if you invest at the right time, but also plenty to lose too. A 500% increase in share price since 2009, following a 700% fall. How does this compare to BTL?
    I can't be arsed to work it out. Property in the SE has risen by about 50% in this time, so with a 90% mortgage they're probably about the same, assuming rent goes to pay the mortgage, agents fees etc.
    One big advantage of the shares is that they can be sold gradually over time, reducing CGT liability, or even held in an ISA. You can buy them a bit at a time too...

    GetExternalChart?chartURL=%26co_dimension%5Eheight%3D326%26co_dimension%5Ewidth%3D480%26chart_primary_ticker%3DGRI%26chart_time_period%3DALL%26primary_chart_type%3Dstack_line%26finance_chart%3D1
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.