We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
credit card debt
Comments
-
Most of what you have said suggests that you don't really care about the legalities but are intent on defrauding some creditors for the benefit of beneficiaries probably including yourself. That is not judgemental but factual.craigedmonds wrote: »You have completely misinterpreted what I have said there in the same way I am legally obliged to pay taxes, but if I can find a way to legally NOT pay them or reduce them, then I will do so to the best of my abilities.
So rather than jump the gun and judge me, why not try and add some positive comments to the thread, otherwise keep your views to yourself.0 -
It perfectly reasonable(and probably legal) to negotiate with a creditor.
There will be restrictions on negotiated terms like not being able to offer preferential payment over another creditor.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »It perfectly reasonable(and probably legal) to negotiate with a creditor.
And if you play silly beggars, its perfectly legal for the creditor to instigate legal proceedings to recover their money and ask for costs.0 -
An executor's duty is to administer the estate in a way that is fair and reasonable to all concerned. That includes creditors who are entitled to the full amount due. The only reason the OP can have for trying to deprive a creditor of their lawful claim is to benefit another beneficiary. That is a breach of trust by the executor. Doing so is illegal.getmore4less wrote: »It perfectly reasonable(and probably legal) to negotiate with a creditor.
There will be restrictions on negotiated terms like not being able to offer preferential payment over another creditor.0 -
craigedmonds wrote: »Prove to me that it is. Morally questionable maybe, but if one can provide legitimate cause for out of pocket expenses which outweighs the debts, prove to me that its fraud.
An estate with assets of £1000 and debts of £600 has a net value of £400, claiming highly exaggerated expenses to prevent the debtors receiving what is legally theirs is simply theft.
There are no legal loopholes round this you must simply pay what is owed, or commit a criminal offence.0 -
People negotiate on a regular basis common is asking to freeze accounts and interest.0
-
Do the credit card company continue to add interest? If so, it would be in beneficiaries interest to finalise details quickly.0
-
getmore4less wrote: »People negotiate on a regular basis common is asking to freeze accounts and interest.
When they don't have the funds to pay the debt. Doesn't sound like that's the case here. If the estate has sufficient funds to pay the debts, they must be paid. If there are insufficient funds to pay all the debtors you pay off who you can pro rata. Nothing left for the beneficiaries, as there is then no value in the estate.
If OP's mum left £1000 in the bank and £600 debts, the beneficiaries of the estate are entitled to £400, the net value of the estate. Assuming mum pre paid her funeral.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
