We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Renting back house I've sold...urgent advice please
dek1972
Posts: 4 Newbie
I sold my house 4 years ago and have recently found myself in a situation where I needed to apply for housing benefit. I am not entitled because of the former owner rule...can't apply for five years. I had to sell due to marriage split, and decided to sell to an investor happy to allow me to stay. The reason for staying and not moving away was my son is autistic and I wanted at a difficult time to keep some continuity in his life.
Now my question is, should my solicitor at the time of sale have advised me about not being able to make any housing benefit claims within 5 years, or at least to get independent advice on the matter. I was never made aware of the former owner rule, until I was called into an interview at the council after the application. I had 3 working days to get together any paperwork they requested, not an ideal amount of time either.
Now my question is, should my solicitor at the time of sale have advised me about not being able to make any housing benefit claims within 5 years, or at least to get independent advice on the matter. I was never made aware of the former owner rule, until I was called into an interview at the council after the application. I had 3 working days to get together any paperwork they requested, not an ideal amount of time either.
0
Comments
-
I doubt they're legally obliged to tell everyone that sells a house that they may have issues claiming benefits one day. Is that all you're asking? Are you looking to blame someone because you're not getting the benefits you want?0
-
Did your solicitor at the time know that you were going to be renting back your former property? E.g. Did they review your new tenancy agreement, or were they just acting for you for the sale? Did you ask for their advice about renting back your former home?
Any complaint against the solicitor is going to take months to resolves, possibly more as this is a tenuous claim at best. You probably need to focus on what you can do cover the shortfall in the rent you can pay, until you can claim HB.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0 -
Did you ask them for advice about housing benefit? Would it actually have made a difference to your decision at the time? Nobody can really advise on what housing benefit rules might be four years in the future anyway.0
-
How much were the proceeds of sale that you have got through since?? There may be a deprivation of capital issue here also...0
-
they were acting on the sale, and yes they knew I was to be renting back the property. I'm sure if they were acting in my best interest as my solicitors they should have made me aware of any pitfalls or at least advised me to get independent advice.0
-
and NO glasgowdan, I'm not looking to blame anyone just because I'm not getting the benefit. I've never asked for this type of help before from the council, if I had known about the rule I would simply have not applied and soldiered on regardless HOW RUDE TO EVEN IMPLY THAT. :mad::mad::mad:0
-
they were acting on the sale, and yes they knew I was to be renting back the property. I'm sure if they were acting in my best interest as my solicitors they should have made me aware of any pitfalls or at least advised me to get independent advice.
You paid your solicitor to perform conveyancing, and that is what they did. I doubt they would even have knowledge of welfare benefits legislation, that would be far outside their remit.0 -
They wouldn't have known your intention to claim housing benefits. Even if they did, they are not benefit advisers, who might have mentioned equity and rules.
Rules like these exist, so as to not have a seller sell their property to a friend\family or partner and then simply rent it back via HB.
:A:dance:1+1+1=1:dance::A
"Marleyboy you are a legend!"
MarleyBoy "You are the Greatest"
Marleyboy You Are A Legend!
Marleyboy speaks sense
marleyboy (total legend)
Marleyboy - You are, indeed, a legend.0 -
As Alice says, conveyancing and welfare rights are pretty separerate specialties. A conveyancing solicitor is unlikely to know much about claimant's rights, especially as benefits law changes so frequently.
You paid for conveyancing services and that's what you received. Had you specifically asked about implications on future benefits claims, the solicitor would/should have either looked it up,or referred you to a specialist.0 -
If you paid the solicitor for advice on the whether to sell your house, you may have a claim, but if you only paid them to convey the house, then you probably don't.
I think a good solicitor should have asked you, when you explained that you were selling the house to rent it back, whether you had considered the implications of this arrangement, and if the answer was no, to advise you to seek advice. I agree with the other posters that benefit rules are outside of what an average solicitor might be expected to be able to advise on, so referring you on would have been the best outcome. But I don't know whether if you ask a solicitor to perform a specific legal service, e.g. convey a house, whether they have to check that you understand the implications of them doing what you ask them to do.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards