We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CCJ from Carpark in Manchester
Comments
-
Hi IamEmanresu
There is no rehearing. The application to set aside stated:
"An order to set aside judgement due to the defendant being unable to answer the claim or our letters because of an address change. Since discovering the claim the defendant had paid the balance off in full. We agree that the courts should set aside our original claim"
They still set it aside. I cant count how many times I read that if you paid them off you will just have it marked as satisfied or the courts will see this as a credit improvement attempt and will reject my application. None-the-less they still set it aside. I didn't even submit proof of an address change, just a note to say they should have used credit referencing to find out where I live.
I think this was more likely because MIL applied themselves to have their original claim removed.
This was done via consent on their end and they ticked all the boxes to do this without hearing as there is no debt to pursue as they have been paid off.
For me my next step is claiming this back off blumming work!0 -
Even still with their fees it worked out the same.
A. Pay MIL £175 + £155 Consent + £80 Made Up Baliff = £430
or Go at it alone which would be
B. £255 Court Fee + £175 Their Claim so they finally stop trying to pursue me = £430
The same price either way, the only advantage of A is they applied themselves on my behalf so I mainly didn't need to prove I could win the case which would have cost even more in terms of legal drafting.
It's a harsh reality but I guess you have to work out how important your credit score is to you.
God I hate them!! Literally backed me into a corner. I'm waiting for the day TM finally puts a stop to this !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards