PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Charles Church and Persimmon in Cheltenham

[FONT=&quot]I've been looking at a new development in Cheltenham by the above builders, it's called either oakley grange or eden villas depending on which section you choose. Unusual thing is, well unusual to me, the whole of the estate roads are being managed and maintained by a residential property management company. I can't work out why the developers aren't handing the roads over to the council, apparently the roads will be finished to an adoptable standard. It's impossible to get a sensible answer from the site sales office. Is this the usual way development roads go.[/FONT]

Comments

  • Freecall
    Freecall Posts: 1,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes, it has become so.

    Local Authorities are increasingly reluctant to adopt roads and open spaces on new developments unless significant payments are made by the developer through S106 or CIL arrangements.

    At the end of the day, it is much cheaper to have the immediate residents pay for maintenance work.

    On a new development this probably amounts to no more than a bit or road sweeping and cutting the grass along with some insurance. It could get expensive a few decades down the road (pun intentional) when the whole lot needs replacing though.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Having been on an active site i wouldn't care if the roads are adopted. I wouldn't touch this crowd with yours.
  • Polaris49
    Polaris49 Posts: 30 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would probably look into persimmon a bit more - they dont have a terribly positive reputation currently!

    Management fees are the norm now though.
  • glasgowdan
    glasgowdan Posts: 2,967 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes, councils generally don't take on new roads as they've quite simply had enough :) Just one of the key reasons I won't touch new builds.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    glasgowdan wrote: »
    Yes, councils generally don't take on new roads as they've quite simply had enough :) Just one of the key reasons I won't touch new builds.

    Indeed.

    And Macadam/ Asphalt is not cheap. Especially when the developers subject the base course to construction traffic for months before the development is finished thereby compromising the sub-base.

    Massive potential cost for any resident.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.