We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Charles Church and Persimmon in Cheltenham

chineplate
Posts: 50 Forumite


[FONT="]I've been looking at a new development in Cheltenham by the above builders, it's called either oakley grange or eden villas depending on which section you choose. Unusual thing is, well unusual to me, the whole of the estate roads are being managed and maintained by a residential property management company. I can't work out why the developers aren't handing the roads over to the council, apparently the roads will be finished to an adoptable standard. It's impossible to get a sensible answer from the site sales office. Is this the usual way development roads go.[/FONT]
0
Comments
-
Yes, it has become so.
Local Authorities are increasingly reluctant to adopt roads and open spaces on new developments unless significant payments are made by the developer through S106 or CIL arrangements.
At the end of the day, it is much cheaper to have the immediate residents pay for maintenance work.
On a new development this probably amounts to no more than a bit or road sweeping and cutting the grass along with some insurance. It could get expensive a few decades down the road (pun intentional) when the whole lot needs replacing though.0 -
Having been on an active site i wouldn't care if the roads are adopted. I wouldn't touch this crowd with yours.0
-
I would probably look into persimmon a bit more - they dont have a terribly positive reputation currently!
Management fees are the norm now though.0 -
Yes, councils generally don't take on new roads as they've quite simply had enough
Just one of the key reasons I won't touch new builds.
0 -
glasgowdan wrote: »Yes, councils generally don't take on new roads as they've quite simply had enough
Just one of the key reasons I won't touch new builds.
Indeed.
And Macadam/ Asphalt is not cheap. Especially when the developers subject the base course to construction traffic for months before the development is finished thereby compromising the sub-base.
Massive potential cost for any resident.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards