We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Divorce Settlement

A friend of mine's house is being sold to allow the financial settlement of the divorce. The sale has dragged for a year but is very close to contract signing - possibly at the end of the month. It transpires her husband has not paid the mortgage for the last 7 or 8 months and the building society put the case in the hands of their solicitors, some 3 months ago, to start reposession proceedings..
The solicitors have been told sale of the property is nearly complete, but they say the court case for a 28 day reposession order will take place next week, unless the contracts are signed beforehand. I find this very harsh because apparently the solicitors have had this information from the conveyancing solicitors and the estate agents. The building society refused to get into dialogue on the matter.
What my friend needs to know is what does this 28 day reposession order actually mean? If the sale is completed within 28 days of the reposession court case will reposession proceedings cease?

Comments

  • roger56
    roger56 Posts: 478 Forumite
    This looks quite involved. Your friend has solicitors, the best advice is for your friend to ask their solicitors directly.

    However just a suggestion, can your friend cover the mortgage payments temporarily?
    If they can, propose it but only through solicitors. It can be taken into account in the divorce settlement.

    If there children involved and the house is the only home then that may enable a stay on the reposession order.

    Do everything at this stage via the solicitors unless you understand the legal implications.
  • NAR
    NAR Posts: 4,863 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Roger56, thanks for replying. Divorce settlement has been agreed; her ex defaulted on paying the mortgage which was stipulated in the financial settlement.

    As case is next week, does anyone know the answers to my questions in the last para, ie
    "What my friend needs to know is what does this 28 day reposession order actually mean? If the sale is completed within 28 days of the reposession court case will reposession proceedings cease?"
  • Bossyboots
    Bossyboots Posts: 6,758 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    In my experience, they will get the 28 day repossession order to cover themselves against the house sale not going through. Sadly, they will have heard it all before and doubtless been caught out a good few times.

    In reality, once they have the order they should postpone it for a period of grace to allow the house to complete rather than enforce it. After all, most of the work is now done, there would be no point in them starting again. However, that is just general from my experience and they should ask them to defer enforcement and see what response they get.
  • NAR
    NAR Posts: 4,863 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Bossyboots, are you saying that if the sale goes through within the 28 days the repossession order will not be acted on?

    I have advised my friend to tell her ex to get in touch with the building society solicitors to ask for a postponement, as the property is nearly sold. As you say they probably have heard this sort of thing before.
  • Bossyboots
    Bossyboots Posts: 6,758 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    NAR wrote:
    Bossyboots, are you saying that if the sale goes through within the 28 days the repossession order will not be acted on?

    I have advised my friend to tell her ex to get in touch with the building society solicitors to ask for a postponement, as the property is nearly sold. As you say they probably have heard this sort of thing before.

    There is no benefit to repossessing a house that is virtually sold and in my experience a short period of grace is given for that to happen when things are advanced. However, any hitch in the sale will result in the possession order being acted upon even though it still ends up being sold to the buyer currently involved. It is an individual matter for the lender involved and needs to be discussed with them as an option. It is also possible, if they apply to the Court, for the Judge to make an order granting repossession but also ordering that it be stayed for a set period for the house to be sold. A letter from the conveyancing solicitor in this instance would assist.
  • NAR
    NAR Posts: 4,863 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks, I'll pass the info on.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.