Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Economists, not the economy, are the only ones taking a battering from Brexit

1235»

Comments

  • There could be no clearer explanation for the use of the term "Remainiac" than reading this thread.
    :T
  • ruperts
    ruperts Posts: 3,673 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 23 August 2016 at 10:53PM
    globalds wrote: »
    I am glad you know the cost of so many items to be able to make such a bold statement about consumer prices.

    Let's take holidays.
    If the cost of going abroad goes up due to exchange rates.
    It would have the consequence of making the staycation more attractive.
    The UK holiday maker is then adding to the economy.


    OK, if we're being ridiculously simplistic then a weak pound makes British businesses attractive takeover targets. How many staycations would I need take to cover the costs of a successful medium sized British business being taken over and having all their profits diverted abroad? Hundreds of thousands, would be my guess. Do I want to go on hundreds of thousands of staycations? Apart from the obvious time constraint issue, no I don't. The weather in the UK is awful. I'd rather holiday in my garden shed than drive to some awful British seaside resort and sit there eating soggy chips in the rain while I pretend to be having a good time.


    I think you've been duped by the politicians who talk about 'the economy' as if a successful economy means more money in your pocket. It doesn't. It means more money in their pocket. We had six years of George Osborne telling us how strong he was making the economy. Great news, he said, we have the fastest growing developed economy in the world. Hoorah! What he neglected to tell us was that we also have the lowest wage growth in the developed world. Our business leaders are raking it in, sure, but ordinary employees haven't had a pay rise for a decade. What good is a strong economy when 99.99% of people are no better off for it?


    A strong pound was at least one thing we had in our favour. It gave us options and spending power. Now we haven't even got that. Business leaders are delighted, now they get us even cheaper. The economy will do fine, I'm sure, but it won't quite do well enough to trigger any pay rises for normal people. It never does, does it? Always seems to be either terrible, in which case you're either getting laid off or a pay cut, or it's doing just ok, in which case you keep your job but no real terms pay rise this year I'm afraid. Funny how the economy is so changeable but somehow never seriously favours the workers, isn't it? It's almost as if it's designed that way.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Brexit hasn't happened yet.... ;)

    The only people looking daft are those claiming the effects of Brexit not happening before Brexit has happened mean they won't ever happen should we Brexit.

    Nope, most of these forecasts were for immediately after a Brexit vote, not for say ten years later.
    And if they cant even get the day after correct, what hope ten years later?
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ruperts wrote: »
    OK, if we're being ridiculously simplistic then a weak pound makes British businesses attractive takeover targets. How many staycations would I need take to cover the costs of a successful medium sized British business being taken over and having all their profits diverted abroad? Hundreds of thousands, would be my guess. Do I want to go on hundreds of thousands of staycations? Apart from the obvious time constraint issue, no I don't. The weather in the UK is awful. I'd rather holiday in my garden shed than drive to some awful British seaside resort and sit there eating soggy chips in the rain while I pretend to be having a good time.

    yes you are being ridiculous.

    I think you've been duped by the politicians who talk about 'the economy' as if a successful economy means more money in your pocket. It doesn't. It means more money in their pocket. We had six years of George Osborne telling us how strong he was making the economy. Great news, he said, we have the fastest growing developed economy in the world. Hoorah! What he neglected to tell us was that we also have the lowest wage growth in the developed world. Our business leaders are raking it in, sure, but ordinary employees haven't had a pay rise for a decade. What good is a strong economy when 99.99% of people are no better off for it?

    all people are massively better off that they were formally which is why millions of people want to come here because everyone is housed and everyone has money whether they work or not.
    A strong pound was at least one thing we had in our favour. It gave us options and spending power. Now we haven't even got that. Business leaders are delighted, now they get us even cheaper. The economy will do fine, I'm sure, but it won't quite do well enough to trigger any pay rises for normal people. It never does, does it? Always seems to be either terrible, in which case you're either getting laid off or a pay cut, or it's doing just ok, in which case you keep your job but no real terms pay rise this year I'm afraid. Funny how the economy is so changeable but somehow never seriously favours the workers, isn't it? It's almost as if it's designed that way.

    the 'strong ' pound was artifically high because we were selling off all our successful businesses, selling land and property and also borrowing large amount of foreign money. Certainly a socialist dream way of living but never going to be a long term thing.
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Nope, most of these forecasts were for immediately after a Brexit vote, not for say ten years later.
    And if they cant even get the day after correct, what hope ten years later?
    What forecasts were that then?
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • Redknapps_Dog
    Redknapps_Dog Posts: 1,670 Forumite
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    What forecasts were that then?
    That deluded and stupid hysterical types (from both sides) would take to the internet and spew out dubious at best stats to support their view.
  • It's not a true science, it's a social science. Cambridge economics graduates receive a Bachelor of Arts degree and the university classifies it as an Arts subject.

    Cambridge Engineering graduates receive a BA too. Discuss.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    For a measure of balance. The IMF in it's annual report on the UK economy released shortly before the vote did also say.
    In a baseline scenario in which the UK remains in the EU, growth would be expected to recover in late 2016, as the effects of the referendum waned. But the IMF’s experts also forecast various threats to the UK economy beyond the closely fought vote.

    They included Britain’s relatively weak trade position, with a record current account deficit last year. There was also uncertainty about the degree to which the UK’s poor productivity growth would recover and risks associated with the UK’s “buoyant” property market.

    Brexit was far from being the only concern. The other risks were unchanged irrespective of the outcome.

    July 2016 balance of trade figures were again poor.

    July 2016 budget surplus was also lower than the corresponding period for 2015.

    Difficult times lie ahead.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Wikipedia wrote:
    19th-century and later universities usually distinguish between arts and sciences subjects by awarding either a B.A. or B.Sc. degree. However, some older or ancient universities, such as Oxford, CambridgeI][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed"]citation needed[/URL][/I and Dublin traditionally award B.A.s to undergraduates having completed the final examinations, e.g. Part II Tripos (Cambridge), Final Honour Schools (Oxford), Moderatorship (Dublin), in most subjects including the sciences.

    FWIW, my economics degree is a BSc, and focused more on the mathematics and statistics side than the old debates between Keynesians and Friedmanites (although that was a matter of personal choice and there was a great deal of flexibility).

    Economics is both an art and a science (I tended towards the science side). As is engineering to some degree (oh dear). Two engineers should agree on how gravity works but can legitimately disagree on how a bridge should be built.
  • Filo25
    Filo25 Posts: 2,140 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Cambridge Engineering graduates receive a BA too. Discuss.

    I was thinking that, by my distant recollection nearly all Cambridge degrees are BAs,with a free MA for good measure a few years later.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.