We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
When to switch to cautious
Options

Rayling
Posts: 24 Forumite
Hi I am saving for retirement at age 65 and I am getting close to 57 now.
I have biggest pension pot invested with Aviva in a mixed investment 20-60% shares it's a midpoint risk level.
At what age do you think I should slip into a more cautious investment as I'm aware the nearer to retirement I get the less risk I should be taking.
I don't currently have an IFA but willing to employ one to advise when time is right for advise on when to take foot of the gas
So I guess I'm asking at what point is it advisable to do the above please
Many thanks
Ray
I have biggest pension pot invested with Aviva in a mixed investment 20-60% shares it's a midpoint risk level.
At what age do you think I should slip into a more cautious investment as I'm aware the nearer to retirement I get the less risk I should be taking.
I don't currently have an IFA but willing to employ one to advise when time is right for advise on when to take foot of the gas
So I guess I'm asking at what point is it advisable to do the above please
Many thanks
Ray
0
Comments
-
I have biggest pension pot invested with Aviva in a mixed investment 20-60% shares it's a midpoint risk level.
Its low/medium. Not midpoint. Although on provider risk scales they may show it higher than it is on conventional risk scales.At what age do you think I should slip into a more cautious investment as I'm aware the nearer to retirement I get the less risk I should be taking.
is that because you are planning to buy an annuity or full fund withdrawal?
If you are planning to use drawdown then you would not reduce the irsk in the same way.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Maybe never, since it depends crucially on whether you will have an immediate need to spend a large portion of the money on something like buying an annuity at a set age. The more flexibility you have in a purchase date or if you even want to buy an annuity the lower the risk level is and the lower the reason to reduce risk becomes.
For a person not buying an annuity it isn't really true that there should be reduction of volatility of investment returns (often called risk) as a planned retirement age approaches. That's because the fixed date issue doesn't arise for most of the pot.
There's a good deal of discussion of the risk-related issues in Drawdown: safe withdrawal rates and you may find reading much of the material there and linked from there of interest to learn more about risk management and the different views that people have of it. A lot of reading but it's not urgent.0 -
Hi thanks both for your replies I can see here my lack of knowledge has made for a rather simplistic way of asking the question.
Basically I am looking for a regular income from my pension much the same as a regular salary income
Not interested in any lump sums just to be paid an income for as long as I survive.0 -
For me the time to move to a more cautious investment is when I don't need the extra return that the riskier investment delivers. If a more cautious investment will meet your needs, why take the extra risk?
For most people, investing in a higher risk fund than you are currently invested in is a necessity, as their expected life span, basic living costs and reduced annuity rates and state pension provison means they won't have enough to live on in old age.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0 -
My pot currently running at £150,0000
-
Depends what other sources of pension income you have. I am lucky in that I have basic widow's pensions and also NHS pension (not a full one) in my own right.
But I also have a SIPP to which I have been contributing in last 6 years. Wish I had known about SIPPs earlier.
And wow what an investment for me! Ticks all the right boxes - tax relief, inheritable (I won't touch it unless my need is dire), Gov contribution via tax relief even when I retire (and I may take pt time job if I can so can contribute more)
Edit - so not cautious with my SIPP0 -
Sounds like another option for me to look into
I'm sat on quite a large isa too0 -
Basically I am looking for a regular income from my pension much the same as a regular salary income
Not interested in any lump sums just to be paid an income for as long as I survive.
In some ways the question is a bit moot because deferring the state pension tends to pay more than buying an annuity for those in normal good health. And you can't defer with a lump sum so there is minimal single point in time risk. But many people in the future will have more money than they can sensibly use to fund deferring their state pension and that option might not be around or might not be attractive when you get there.
So for all or part of the pot, can you handle the ups and downs of investment in retirement in exchange for getting a substantially higher income if normal times happen, or a comparable one if the worst historic case happens? If you can't, then you might well be a good candidate for buying an annuity even though it locks in the worst case income level: it does that with close to certainty. But in exchange you get the income even if something worse than history happens, assuming that the annuity company survives or if not the FSCS pays out, which in a worse than history case isn't so certain either.
Annuities for those in normal good health start to offer really good value for money somewhere around 80-85 years old at the moment, perhaps a bit older.0 -
One problem is that it's not at all clear what "cautious" might be. Classically it meant lots of bonds. When bonds yielded real income, and when people planned to buy annuities, this made sense.
Whereas now annuities seem such poor value that people in good health probably wouldn't want to buy one before age 80-85, and bonds seem astonishingly risky.
Our "cautious" money is in a mixture of sterling cash (in high interest current accounts), ETFs of precious metals (in ISAs and SIPPs), and Extra State Pensions bought by pension deferral.
Are we right? Lord knows.Free the dunston one next time too.0 -
Thanks very much indeed for your very detailed replies I really appreciate your efforts in replying so succinctly
I will have a good read and digest your kind advice
Thanks0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards