We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
AS Parking Perranporth now CCC
Comments
-
Check if the date in the particulars claim actually matches the date the charge was issued, the chimps are messing loads of them up.0
-
Thanks and well spotted, will amend thatIamEmanresu wrote: »Take out the reference to Horizon @ 5.
Not sure 7 is expressed the correct way. Beavis was all about "legitimate interest" as UTCCR was kicked out. "Legitimate interest" IMHO was a shading of UTCCR. So 7a is probably closer to the mark
The issue date does match, however the fee states £150, instead of AS Parkings original fee of £100. Also interest has been added at the statutory rate (up to 3rd August) despite this being included on any terms, or correspondence. Is that another ground to defend against?Check if the date in the particulars claim actually matches the date the charge was issued, the chimps are messing loads of them up.
A due date is mentioned set at 30 days. Stating this should have been paid on/before 2nd April 20160 -
As it is known that a NTD was issued (windscreen ticket), 4.c) is redundant.0
-
If it's the top car park (Droskyn), then it isn't relevant land under POFAIllegitimi non carborundum:)0
-
Thanks, this one was Promenade on Beach RoadIvor_Pecheque wrote: »If it's the top car park (Droskyn), then it isn't relevant land under POFA
Anything further to add?0 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »
But to others reading this, once you have read the Google cache proof and seen and understood who was the innocent party here, let's move on to helping posters together and not have a binfest.
Welcome home coupon-mad, you have been greatly missed, nice to see you are back.
PPC's and Debt collectors be warned:rotfl:0 -
Welcome back C-m ... someone who resembles my avatar will be back on Sunday/Monday.
0 -
Welcome back C-M, welcome back Bod. 0
-
I don't think Bod was PPRd due to activity in this board ... I think it was someone in Consumer Rights or Praise, Vent being "precious". 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards