AS Parking Perranporth now CCC

pugger

Check if the date in the particulars claim actually matches the date the charge was issued, the chimps are messing loads of them up.

bungholio

IamEmanresu wrote: »

Take out the reference to Horizon @ 5.

Not sure 7 is expressed the correct way. Beavis was all about "legitimate interest" as UTCCR was kicked out. "Legitimate interest" IMHO was a shading of UTCCR. So 7a is probably closer to the mark

Thanks and well spotted, will amend that

pugger wrote: »

Check if the date in the particulars claim actually matches the date the charge was issued, the chimps are messing loads of them up.

The issue date does match, however the fee states £150, instead of AS Parkings original fee of £100. Also interest has been added at the statutory rate (up to 3rd August) despite this being included on any terms, or correspondence. Is that another ground to defend against?

A due date is mentioned set at 30 days. Stating this should have been paid on/before 2nd April 2016

bod1467

As it is known that a NTD was issued (windscreen ticket), 4.c) is redundant.

bungholio

bod1467 wrote: »

As it is known that a NTD was issued (windscreen ticket), 4.c) is redundant.

Thank you, noted and removed

Ivor_Pecheque

If it's the top car park (Droskyn), then it isn't relevant land under POFA

bungholio

Ivor_Pecheque wrote: »

If it's the top car park (Droskyn), then it isn't relevant land under POFA

Thanks, this one was Promenade on Beach Road

Anything further to add?

beamerguy

Coupon-mad wrote: »

But to others reading this, once you have read the Google cache proof and seen and understood who was the innocent party here, let's move on to helping posters together and not have a binfest.

Welcome home coupon-mad, you have been greatly missed, nice to see you are back.

PPC's and Debt collectors be warned:rotfl:

DoaM

Welcome back C-m ... someone who resembles my avatar will be back on Sunday/Monday.

Edna_Basher

Welcome back C-M, welcome back Bod.

DoaM

I don't think Bod was PPRd due to activity in this board ... I think it was someone in Consumer Rights or Praise, Vent being "precious".