📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Misrepresentation Act

13»

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    And of course, those who buy their homes rather than rent would never have a criminal record would they?!
    Indeed.
    Drug dealing is not the sole province of Council Estates and Social Housing either.
  • steampowered
    steampowered Posts: 6,176
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Unfortunately, it doesn't sound to me like the legal route will get you anywhere:

    1) Can you prove what you were told by the developer before you bought? If not, its hard to go legal.

    2) A good development contract will contain an "entire agreement" clause under which you agree that you are buying only on the basis of what is written in the contract and not on the basis of anything you were told verbally. It would be difficult to overcome this.

    3) Legally, you'd have to prove that failure to undertake the checks led to the difficulties you are suffering. This is difficult. It is also possible, I guess, that checks were undertaken but tenants allowed to rent there anyway.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179.1K Life & Family
  • 264K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards
Quick Search

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.