We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Self-employed and Working Tax Credits
Hheyes
Posts: 15 Forumite
Does anybody have useful experience and/or suggestions regarding claiming WTC when self-employed?
With a recent start-up, my activity is deemed as 'not qualifying - not commercial or profitable'.
Long-story-short is that the claim was submitted in April whilst working on pre-launch activity.
After rejection, I requested a mandatory reconsideration, by the time of which I'd been trading a week-or-two and submitted evidence of about $2500 (dollars, because most of my activity is oriented toward the US and is received in my $ PayPal account).
I've now just received another refusal, advising that I didn't provide proof of activity for the pre-launch before I began receiving income.
Perhaps mistakenly, it seems to me that there's an element of whomever decides this either not being appropriately aware of s/emp activity, or deliberately ignoring it.
I'm tempted to just forget the whole thing, but income will be likely be unpredictable/irregular/low for some months and £55-or-so weekly will be very useful.
With a recent start-up, my activity is deemed as 'not qualifying - not commercial or profitable'.
Long-story-short is that the claim was submitted in April whilst working on pre-launch activity.
After rejection, I requested a mandatory reconsideration, by the time of which I'd been trading a week-or-two and submitted evidence of about $2500 (dollars, because most of my activity is oriented toward the US and is received in my $ PayPal account).
I've now just received another refusal, advising that I didn't provide proof of activity for the pre-launch before I began receiving income.
Perhaps mistakenly, it seems to me that there's an element of whomever decides this either not being appropriately aware of s/emp activity, or deliberately ignoring it.
I'm tempted to just forget the whole thing, but income will be likely be unpredictable/irregular/low for some months and £55-or-so weekly will be very useful.
0
Comments
-
What does the $2,500 represent? What is your profit, and what kind of business is it?0
-
Not wishing to be rude... I don't see how that's really relevant.
But I'm happy to answer anyway... the business provides business-oriented info through a paid-membership website. Of that $2.5k, after initial setup costs probably half of it is currently profit - but with ongoing costs that percentage may reduce depending on ongoing income.0 -
Not wishing to be rude... I don't see how that's really relevant.
But I'm happy to answer anyway... the business provides business-oriented info through a paid-membership website. Of that $2.5k, after initial setup costs probably half of it is currently profit - but with ongoing costs that percentage may reduce depending on ongoing income.
It's relevant because that's the kind of information HMRC will use to judge whether the business is viable. Have you provided them with a business plan, with protected earnings in the longer term?0 -
They've had an outline strategy/operations guide... which is more honest (about money) and relevant (to what'll likely happen) than a standard business plan, and with appropriate financials which duly note the difficulty of accurate projections.
I'm not being difficult here, but I've done and taught this stuff for much of the past forty years - and hence am aware of just how inappropriate a BP can often be.0 -
They've had an outline strategy/operations guide... which is more honest (about money) and relevant (to what'll likely happen) than a standard business plan, and with appropriate financials which duly note the difficulty of accurate projections.
I'm not being difficult here, but I've done and taught this stuff for much of the past forty years - and hence am aware of just how inappropriate a BP can often be.
I don't think anyone is suggesting you are being difficult
HMRC have decided that your business isn't viable and you need to convince them otherwise so really you do need to provide whatever they ask of you.0 -
They haven't asked for anything that hasn't been provided.
When initially asked 'What have you been doing?' I answered honestly with something like 'I spend my time building(tech and content) the site, and communicating with potential/actual clients, content providers and others.'
I haven't been asked for further detail.0 -
Could the issue be relating to hours worked? Ie, launching time, it would be reasonable to account most of your time building the site, advertising etc... but clearly questionable to still be claiming the same hours spent now that your business is supposed to be operational.0
-
If you don't agree with their decision then appeal it.0
-
Could the issue be relating to hours worked? Ie, launching time, it would be reasonable to account most of your time building the site, advertising etc... but clearly questionable to still be claiming the same hours spent now that your business is supposed to be operational.
I haven't claimed the same hours for both periods - they haven't even asked me.
The reasonable-and-true backstory is that when I claimed, I was doing things (building) which advisories suggest count toward 'legit activity'. And now, a month-or-two later I'm also doing other things (operating) which advisories suggest count as 'legit activity'.
But I've not been asked about this... my initial claim (which contained 'I'm doing pre-launch work') was refused.
So I asked for the reconsideration and submitted an update ('now launched, here's 10 days income of $2.5k, and I still spend my time doing many of the same things - updating site tech/copy, contact with potential/actual clients and content providers and others). That too has been refused.0 -
Darksparkle wrote: »If you don't agree with their decision then appeal it.
Thanks.
Not being rude.. I'm aware of that and may do so.
My main reason for posting is to see if anyone else has has similar/relevant experience.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
