We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FTBs - What to offer
Options
Comments
-
iantojones40 wrote: »Just because >£200k and £210k happen to be in the same ball park doesn't mean that's what the property is worth and the evidence suggests it's not.0
-
mrlegend123 wrote: »I agree, why would you pay over what the property is worth? I believe this type of behaviour drives up house prices.0
-
Am i allowed to post a link to it ?0
-
Just be aware that most of the people responding have probably already paid over the odds for a property and want you to do the same so that they feel better about their decision.0
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »Just be aware that most of the people responding have probably already paid over the odds for a property and want you to do the same so that they feel better about their decision.
That takes the biscuit you are the worse all you do is responding trying to talk property down because you've wasted to much money renting while waiting for a crash.0 -
My first thought is why has it been sold 3 times in such a short time frame? I'd always be wary if a property has exchanged hands a lot in a short period.
Re prices, I think that's simply down to how the market has gone recently.
Re offer, I'd ask just under the £200k. If this is going to be your home and you love it. I think go for it.
When we sold our house (last month) I told our buyers there was 'wriggle room' and when we viewed our new home we asked the seller whether she was open to offers?
It's a fine line between offering a sensible price without offending the seller0 -
My first thought is why has it been sold 3 times in such a short time frame? I'd always be wary if a property has exchanged hands a lot in a short period.
Re prices, I think that's simply down to how the market has gone recently.
Re offer, I'd ask just under the £200k. If this is going to be your home and you love it. I think go for it.
When we sold our house (last month) I told our buyers there was 'wriggle room' and when we viewed our new home we asked the seller whether she was open to offers?
It's a fine line between offering a sensible price without offending the seller
I don't believe It has been sold three times. It's been on the market by the same seller three times with three agencies.
That could be for any number of reasons, though likely none of them are good. either overpriced, or sellers can't find somewhere to move to are the most likely.
I'd offer slightly below what I thought it was worth according to similar houses nearby, irrespective of what the actual asking price is.0 -
mrlegend123 wrote: »As a FTB, I have been using the rule of 90% of the asking price as a starting offer then negotiating from there. My maximum offer on any house is 94% of the asking prices - regardless.
By doing that you'd miss out on any house that was realistically priced but buy one for more than it was worth (as long as the vendors had priced it sufficiently high ).
FWIW if there was this "rule of 90%" you mention, then everyone would simply add 10% to their asking prices. But there isn't, and they don't. Each case is different. Some people ask too much as they are unrealistic (and won't accept less), others ask realistic prices, others may price at slightly lower than they could eventually get as they need a quick sale. Defining one rigid rule doesn't fit real life and as said may end up with you paying more or missing out on a well priced house or even one that's a bargain price.
Why not ignore asking price and offer slightly below what you think it's actually worth (which may bear only a passing resemblance to asking price) ? If you've been looking and offering for a while you should get a good idea of a reasonable price.0 -
So, had a new email alert from rightmove yesterday telling me that there was a new property listing in my chosen area.
Turns out it's this house again. No change in price or EA this time though.
Is this used as a ploy by the EA to reset the listing date and so sending out a new property alert or can anyone think of anything else why they would do this.
Thanks for all your responses. Feeling very confused about this one.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards