PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rabbits in my flat

Options
1235712

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Cornucopia wrote: »
    Yes, I understand that that is the argument. I'm just not convinced it's true.

    Why not? Just because it's called the Allotments Act? The title of an Act doesn't have any relevance to its interpretation. If they didn't mean "any land" they wouldn't have said "any land".
  • d70cw6
    d70cw6 Posts: 784 Forumite
    just make a pie.....
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,482 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    davidmcn wrote: »
    Why not? Just because it's called the Allotments Act? The title of an Act doesn't have any relevance to its interpretation. If they didn't mean "any land" they wouldn't have said "any land".

    I think they mean land, not the interior of existing buildings.

    I think that because the Act also provides for the provision of "buildings upon the land", which does not make sense in the context of the land (allegedly) being the interior of a building.
  • MistyZ
    MistyZ Posts: 1,820 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'd negotiate, I'd be very polite, very reasonable, very calm. There may be leeway. Like you say, the rabbits do not inconvenience anyone. It's horrible thinking that you may have to re-home beloved pets to keep your home but ultimately you may have to choose. If it comes to it, go for a good charity that doesn't put animals down. But I wouldn't mind betting that coming across as very responsible pet owners would swing things in your favour.
  • 19lottie82
    19lottie82 Posts: 6,030 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    OP........ They may tell you to get rid of them, but realistically what are they going to do about it? Take you to court? Expensive / time consuming and here not guaranteed to win. Therefore, I'm very confident that they won't.

    I'm obviously going to get people saying how you agreed to the contractual terms of the lease, but personally, I'd just ignore them. Or tell them you've got rid of the rabbits. They won't know otherwise.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    19lottie82 wrote: »
    OP........ They may tell you to get rid of them, but realistically what are they going to do about it? Take you to court? Expensive / time consuming and here not guaranteed to win. Therefore, I'm very confident that they won't.

    I'm obviously going to get people saying how you agreed to the contractual terms of the lease, but personally, I'd just ignore them. Or tell them you've got rid of the rabbits. They won't know otherwise.[/QUOTE]

    Since the OP believes they knew the rabbits were there via cameras or a concierge, it seems likely they will know.
  • TheGardener
    TheGardener Posts: 3,303 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 July 2016 at 9:38AM
    Point out that the Allotments Act 1950 s12 permits you to keep rabbits or hens. Oh yes, really.

    http://nearlylegal.co.uk/2011/04/oh-cluck/

    Oh cluck indeed!

    I don't see how legislation that regulates Local Authority Allotments Land has any impact on land or property in/on/near peoples back gardens? Allotment land has a legal status and is defined (Allotments Act 1908) in terms of its boundaries and use as "wholly or mainly for the production of fruit and vegetables" - it has no influence whatsoever on private gardens or land publicly or privately owned. The statutory duty to provide allotments is only applicable to an LA, no other body or person - it does not cover any other land or property and even the statutory duty is not applicable to any inner London Borough (s.55(4) of the London Government Act 1963)
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,482 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't see how legislation that regulates Local Authority Allotments Land has any impact on land or property in/on/near peoples back gardens?

    This isn't about a back garden. The suggestion is that legislation about Allotments applies to the interior of the OP's flat, because that is "deemed" to be "land" in other, completely separate legislation.
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Just a thought: you say that you let your rabbits run about the flat a few hours a day. Are you on an upstairs flat? Could that running around actually be noisy to those living under and they put in a complaint?
  • Miss_Samantha
    Miss_Samantha Posts: 1,197 Forumite
    I don't see how legislation that regulates Local Authority Allotments Land has any impact on land or property in/on/near peoples back gardens?

    Have you read the relevant section of the Act? (I am just copy pasting this question at this point)

    It has nothing to do with allotments beyond the title of the Act.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.