We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Out of the loop for a couple of years; can I run this by everyone?
I rather think that was part of the OP's submission to POPLA. I've never witnessed POPLA making any form of comment - one way or another - once the PPC has withdrawn from the process.
Perhaps the OP can confirm?
PS - you called it 'a spanking', not me!
Whatever happened ..... PE would have seen the appeal and withdrew and maybe it was the OP who gave the spanking but, whatever one calls it, PE backed down
I agree with the Deep, the OP should now invoice PE
Slightly late with this but I should clarify; everything from (inclusively) "I appeal against the parking charge on the following grounds:" in my post constituted my own POPLA appeal wording; including the bit about "The operator has been reasonably advised...".
This therefore wasn't much of a spanking as they simply didn't submit evidence, though it'd have been interesting to see if it turned into a spanking if they did.
