We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

OFT May Cop Out Of Test Case

''The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) could drop next year's High Court test case over bank overdraft charges, a senior official has said.''


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6989510.stm
«13

Comments

  • How typical is that, Pah! at the OFT...they need to make they bliddy minds up either they are going to test case the banks or they are not...eitherway...why the heck are we all being stayed if the OFT are going to poodle out on us...This is just making a mock of the whole court system and its P***ing me off!
  • Aggy_2
    Aggy_2 Posts: 48 Forumite
    Read this and wondered if it would happen or if it was more hot air.?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6989510.stm
  • Aggy wrote: »
    Read this and wondered if it would happen or if it was more hot air.?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6989510.stm
    Cheers Aggy but its already been posted by Nathan Spleen.
  • Hmmmm this is why the Stays are a waste of time in plain English....

    Could that page be used with the below highlighted in our own court cases or when trying to get Stays lifted?

    "the judge will not be asked to rule on whether bank charges are legal or fair."
  • Could this mean that the banks get away with offering super low charges/interest rates etc and then not have to even look at the past cases???
  • techspec
    techspec Posts: 4,464 Forumite
    A predictable KOP out. They should have kept their brown noses out of it.
  • icefall
    icefall Posts: 1,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    interesting news

    thanks op

    sounds like there is a lot going on behind the scenes
    I always wanted to be a procrastinator, never got round to it...
  • What I find troubling is the remark that the OFT agrees in most instances that the charges are not penalties. However they are still unfair. How do they come to that conclusion
    As I am not the Pope or legally qualified I may be wrong so feel free to get a second opinion from a qualified person
  • I agree with that, Stokey. This is beginning to look like one almighty farce in the making. Just how much is this 'compromise' figure likely to be, if it's agreed on before a trial, and in whose favour? The OFT should have the backbone to see this through; if they cop out now without any clear, fair resolution they'll be an utter laughing stock.
  • So if thats the case where the OFT looks to be backing off with the banks.

    Where does that leave us with the claims either in the Courts or this so called test case which the banks are waiting for, before proceeding any further with the claims.

    What do we do now??
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.