We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Shared ownership & lodger
                
                    sharedownershipsally                
                
                    Posts: 1 Newbie                
            
                        
            
                    A fellow resident has just been reminded he may not sublet his room through Air B&B and pointed to clauses below.
My question is, do these points allow a live in lodger with no lock on the door?
3.16 Use
Not to use the Premises for anything other than a private residence in single occupation.
3.18 Alienation:
3.18.1 Not to assing, underlet, charge, mortgage, or part with possession of part only of the Premises.
3.18.2 Not to underlet or part with possession of the whole of the premises...
3.18.3 Not without written consent of the Landlord (such consent not to be unreasonably witheld) to mortgage or chage the Premises before Final Staircasing has been accomplished.
3.18.4 Not without written consent of the Landlord(such consent not to be unreasonably withheld) to mortgage or charge the Premises before Final Staircasing has been accomplished.
                My question is, do these points allow a live in lodger with no lock on the door?
3.16 Use
Not to use the Premises for anything other than a private residence in single occupation.
3.18 Alienation:
3.18.1 Not to assing, underlet, charge, mortgage, or part with possession of part only of the Premises.
3.18.2 Not to underlet or part with possession of the whole of the premises...
3.18.3 Not without written consent of the Landlord (such consent not to be unreasonably witheld) to mortgage or chage the Premises before Final Staircasing has been accomplished.
3.18.4 Not without written consent of the Landlord(such consent not to be unreasonably withheld) to mortgage or charge the Premises before Final Staircasing has been accomplished.
0        
            Comments
- 
            Am I missing something or does "single occupation" mean something other than what it seems to?0
 - 
            As long as you didn't grant the lodger a tenancy with exclusive occupation of their room, I'd say that it's not subletting part of tge premises and they are part of your household (which is also the case for council tax I believe). Therefore I believe a lodger is not prevented by those lease exerts.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
 - 
            Not to use the Premises for anything other than a private residence in single occupation.
Seems clear.0 - 
            
For Council Tax purposes - as long as the actual tenant of the property is resident the situation remains the same, regardless of whether they give the 'lodger' an agreement or not. He'd simply be another occupier of the property who removed the entitlement (unless he was disregarded) to any 25% single occupancy discount.As long as you didn't grant the lodger a tenancy with exclusive occupation of their room, I'd say that it's not subletting part of tge premises and they are part of your household (which is also the case for council tax I believe). Therefore I believe a lodger is not prevented by those lease exerts.
CraigI no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
