We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Me and Excel - At war!
Options
Comments
-
... he certainly didn't like losing. He was utterly dejected at the end.
I am glad he was, sad to say. Nasty people deserve it.
Seriously, if he's going to 'work' in this despicable industry/motley crew of notorious ex-clampers, choosing a firm exposed and reported by the Parking Prankster as the worst, most complained about parking company (bar none) with over a third of complaints/reports made to the Prankster being about Excel in January 2017:
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/worst-parking-company-jan-2017.html
then he deserves to be beaten in court by an honest motorist like you.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Epic. I'm cracking a bottle of pinot on this one myself! Awesome work Lamilad and associated friends - absolutely delighted for you.
A true inspiration to all those innocent motorists currently fighting the fight against these parasitic parking scumpanies. An intriguing set of events - almost felt there myself at times! :T:T:T:beer:0 -
going up against JB was very different to the bumbling, fumbling, stumbling Mr Pickup. He knows his stuff and is sharp as a tack. He managed to make a very weak argument seem quite credible. He said, towards the end, that he had never had a judge decide against him before, I'm sure thats not true (I think it was a last ditch attempt to sway the judge) but he certainly didn't like losing. He was utterly dejected at the end - but then it was a long and, at times, quite confrontational, hearing.
This "solicitor bod" cannot be that sharp ..... HE LOST
Did I forget to say ..... HE LOST
As they are "forum picking", it rather shows that they have no real evidence and most of all THEY ARE SCARED STIFF OF THESE FORUMS
Could be the word is out in the courts about Excel/VCS/BWLegal and their attempt to extort money.
Seems that any solicitor representing this lot will have a tough time in the future
The simple fact is that these parking companies have already played their hand in courts. There is little more they can say. We already know the cards they play but with the motorist there will always be other hands to play which the scum will never know until it happens and that is where the judge takes over.
12 months ago, the scum won because the judges really were clueless.
NOW, the judges have seen the light and this could be a direction from government to the courts.
Maybe we don't need the DCLG to sort out the scammers, maybe the scammers will destroy themselves.
If their scam no longer works in court, it becomes a dead industry who could only rely on people just paying the ticket value without question.
And that must now be the target0 -
This "solicitor bod" cannot be that sharp ..... HE LOST
JB is not a 'solicitor bod', he is an Associate Chartered Legal Executive directly employed by Excel, or VCS depending on which version of his signature is in play.
As such, he will be far more clued up than the average hired gun that BW Legal send in, because parking is what he deals with every day.
But however good your advocacy skills might be, you will never win every case, and in this one he couldn't rely on POFA because the NTK wasn't compliant, and the original WS said they weren't relying on it.
It all came down to the forum posts, and there was no conclusive evidence in those.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
JB is not a 'solicitor bod', he is an Associate Chartered Legal Executive directly employed by Excel, or VCS depending on which version of his signature is in play.
As such, he will be far more clued up than the average hired gun that BW Legal send in, because parking is what he deals with every day.
But however good your advocacy skills might be, you will never win every case, and in this one he couldn't rely on POFA because the NTK wasn't compliant, and the original WS said they weren't relying on it.
It all came down to the forum posts, and there was no conclusive evidence in those.
BP. whatever title he goes under .... HE LOST
If he could not rely on POFA because the NTK was not compliant surely he would have spent better time on the golf course than nit picking words from a forum.0 -
It all came down to the forum posts, and there was no conclusive evidence in those.
That's exactly what it came down to. In fact that's all we talked about for nearly 3 hours. He only had scraps to work with but he made the most of what he had.
It bothers me a little that he had me on the ropes at one point esp as I'd dominated proceedings until that point and his case was so weak. It was my inexperience that allowed him to do this.
He is skilled in his art (argument, manipulation) but I think a more experienced defendant would have killed him off rather than allowing him to "phoenix"0 -
That's exactly what it came down to. In fact that's all we talked about for nearly 3 hours. He only had scraps to work with but he made the most of what he had.
It bothers me a little that he had me on the ropes at one point esp as I'd dominated proceedings until that point and his case was so weak. It was my inexperience that allowed him to do this.
He is skilled in his art (argument, manipulation) but I think a more experienced defendant would have killed him off rather than allowing him to "phoenix"
Highly possible the judge saw that happening and understood you were not experienced.
Yes, if he came up against a savvy person it would have knocked off 10 mins
Even though he carries a grand title, he failed.
I have seen good salesmen knock the socks off their managing director
You have done a brilliant job and I hope you help others here and give them the confidence to win.
If this is the best Excel can do, should be easy0 -
Well done Lamilad - was wondering what was going on with your cases ... now I know.
Good job!0 -
Well done lad.
Are you going for a DPA breach now, or have you just had enough?I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards