We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Freeholder charge for change of deed

Hi there
I'm in the process of building a side return kitchen extension on my leasehold ground floor flat. I've applied for planning permission which has been granted.

However, my freeholder claims my lease prohibits such work being carried out and has quoted £4000 (orginally £6000) to change the deed and grant us permission.

My lease states (I quote) "Not during said term: Erect or instal permit to be erected or installed on the demised premises or any additional buildings chimney of flue any engine whether driven by steam oil electric energy or otherwise".

This charge seems to be extremely high considering the small about of work involved to change the deed.

Is this reasonable? Should I just accept the fee and pay it? Is this type of thing regulated or can they just charge what they want?

Many thanks

Comments

  • They can charge what’s stipulated in the lease, People forget that freeholder becomes responsible for it e.g higher insurance or roof leaks, painting etc Typically cost then becomes the responsibility of freeholder who in turn passes this onto leaseholders so its not just about changing the odd word here and there on the lease so to speak If your not sure about the lease ask your solicitor.
  • How can the freeholder become responsible for it when I pay the buidlings insurance? Our buildings insurance premium is also very high because it has to be from a provider approved by the freeholder.

    There is nothing in the lease that mentions a fee. I've included what the lease says above with regards to this. I've also consulted my solicitor who has just highlighted the quote above.
  • How can the freeholder become responsible for it when I pay the buidlings insurance? Our buildings insurance premium is also very high because it has to be from a provider approved by the freeholder.

    There is nothing in the lease that mentions a fee. I've included what the lease says above with regards to this. I've also consulted my solicitor who has just highlighted the quote above.
    Ditto saying fee wouldn't be charged....

    Do you believe they cant charge for additions to “there” building the clue is its not your building etc its "there’s " do you not understand the basics of freeholder/ leaseholder ?

    If there is no stipulation within lease unusual but not impossible most charge % of increase in value that the extension adds to your leasehold plus any legal fee re-drawing lease etc ,

    Don’t know what you solicitor is doing there clearly not very good or knowledgeable otherwise they would advise you correctly,

    Extension may also increase insurance e.g. higher rebuild cost? It becomes the freeholders you don't take it with you when you move ?
  • Do you believe they cant charge for additions to “there” building the clue is its not your building etc its "there’s " do you not understand the basics of freeholder/ leaseholder ?
    Of course I accept the fact that they have a right to charge for this, my question was whether this fee is reasonable.
  • Of course I accept the fact that they have a right to charge for this, my question was whether this fee is reasonable.
    [FONT=&quot]Unfortunately if not defined within the lease to a extent it becomes subjective and that tends to only be answered if you start legal route, If freeholders is knowledgeable you can be sure that they will get maximum out of it fair/ reasonable has no influence at all...[/FONT]
  • casper_g
    casper_g Posts: 1,110 Forumite
    edited 7 July 2016 at 8:55PM
    It's hard to be sure without seeing it in context, but the quoted text doesn't seem to have anything to do with building an extension.

    The text is a bit garbled (e.g. missing apostrophes, "of" in place of "or") but seems to be saying either:
    1. You can't put up any "engine" on the chimney or flue of either "the demised premises" or of "any additional buildings"; or
    2. You're not allowed to put up chimneys or flues or engines, whether that's on the demised premises or on any additional buildings.

    Was this text extracted from a digitised version of the document? Do you have access to the original?

    That said, it is usual for a freeholder to have to give permission for an extension. And it's usual for a fee to be charged.
  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    casper_g wrote: »
    It's hard to be sure without seeing it in context, but the quoted text doesn't seem to have anything to do with building an extension.

    The text is a bit garbled (e.g. missing apostrophes, "of" in place of "or") but seems to be saying either:
    1. You can't put up any "engine" on the chimney or flue of either "the demised premises" or of "any additional buildings"; or
    2. You're not allowed to put up chimneys or flues or engines, whether that's on the demised premises or on any additional buildings.

    Was this text extracted from a digitised version of the document? Do you have access to the original?

    That said, it is usual for a freeholder to have to give permission for an extension. And it's usual for a fee to be charged.

    I think it's very common for legal documents not to include punctuation like commas.

    The lease states you can erect any building, as well as the other items not relevant in this case. You do not own any of the building so again it's not a surprise you can't change the building. So it seems if you want to do so you need the lease to say it's okay and/or change your demised premises to include the additional bit of building. The freeholder is charging to do this. Your solicitor shoukd be advising you whether they can charge that high or go to lease.org.
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • casper_g
    casper_g Posts: 1,110 Forumite
    edited 8 July 2016 at 7:34AM
    Kynthia wrote: »
    The lease states you can erect any building


    Did you mean "can't erect any building"?

    I just don't think the passage quoted says anything about erecting buildings. It is all about engines.

    It says that during the term of the lease you must neither [erect/install] nor [permit to be erected/installed] any [engine whether driven by steam oil electric energy or otherwise]. The location where engines can't be put is the [demised premises] or [any additional buildings, chimneys or flues].
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.