We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Hypothetical Q - Home ownership split upon divorce
Comments
-
Wait, doesn't the declaration of trust still take effect after you get married?
It seems unfair if one partner is putting in £100k deposit and the other partner is putting in nothing, that the house will be split 50:50
Who said it would be split 50:50? In short marriages judges try to put each party back to their respective starting positions, although need, any children, and any non-financial relevant factors will be considered. The longer people build a life together and share everything they have the more of an even financial split will take place.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0 -
cashbackproblems wrote: »thanks for all the responses! To make it clearer, we have been together for 3 years and yes would look to marry in the next 18 months - 2 years, but from what i have read the courts will still give rights to your partner on property etc which you bought before marriage. I think its fair if she pays some of the mortgage for 2 years she gets that amount back (partially), but not half of the whole property after just 2/3 yrs of marriage and having contributed 0% of the deposit and fees.
This is a big concern as i am putting into it 100k of my own savings, and won't lose it. I will consider a declaration of trust if we don't get married, i haven't discussed this with her but I'm sure she would sign it but apparently it has no legal holding. She has no savings, major job prospects (but a stable income) so is reliant on me. Its not that i expect things to go wrong..but i have seen they can
Regarding offshore account, it is in a non-EU jurisdiction and i have been assured by a tax lawyer that no one would know about this, plus any excess cash i would probably slowly put under my mums name so she can't get it.
Inheritance tax will be a bummer....
tbh you don't sound trustworthy, this marriage isn't going to last0 -
Don't need a document to gain a beneficial interest, it happens simply by contributing to the mortgage.
I didn't say we needed a document for beneficial interest, simply that if one person is putting in the deposit and the other one isn't then you can get a document that states that person gets the first XX of any profit made from the sale.0 -
psychopathbabble wrote: »I didn't say we needed a document for beneficial interest, simply that if one person is putting in the deposit and the other one isn't then you can get a document that states that person gets the first XX of any profit made from the sale.
Oh you make me smile....
You think a document which entitles one party to extra 'profit' over the other hasn't been challenged in court before?0 -
cashbackproblems wrote: »Regarding offshore account, it is in a non-EU jurisdiction and i have been assured by a tax lawyer that no one would know about this, plus any excess cash i would probably slowly put under my mums name so she can't get it.
Oh don't you sound quite the catch, I bet she can't wait to marry you. Together three years, and you're thinking of hiding money so that she cannot even think of a claim should you split in the future.
I hope to goodness that she reads this thread before deciding to hitch her wagon to your star.:heartpuls Mrs Marleyboy :heartpuls
MSE: many of the benefits of a helpful family, without disadvantages like having to compete for the tv remote
Proud Parents to an Aut-some son
0 -
What tig just said...
The first question of protecting the house if you have funded it entirely yourself might be excused. If one party brings a major asset into the relationship - I don't think it fair that it be suddenly turned into a marital asset to be equally split. Same goes if one party has a major liability like existing debts. But that isn't quite the case here - you are already in the relationship and planning to acquire the asset. Have you explained to your girlfriend that you are planning on buying a house which you might let her live in and contribute to - but it's in your name only? As opposed to buying a place together and needing to establish that you will have contributed a greater portion?
Then we discover that you are already planning to hide other assets which you expect to gain - the offshore account and money in your mother's name. Tax-efficient it may be - but it looks as if you don't trust your girlfriend enough to marry her.
There might be reasons behind this - major discrepancy in incomes/assets; girlfriend's previous track record. But it doesn't look promising...I need to think of something new here...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

