We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Fund of funds hide fees
Comments
-
Mostly I'm using 5% current accounts and regular savers for cashThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Another reason for using isa is that its tax credit efficient, outside of isa im only allowed to make £300 a year before it affects them, I chose an accumulation fund rather than an income one as dividends would count towards this £300 limitThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Nah s&s isa, pension is DB, I'm simply looking for an alternative to mortgage overpayments that performs better and gives me liquidity, and maybe can use for early retirement or wedding
Can't find that specific fund in trustnet, did you buy through a bank or insurer?
The closest I could find seems to be a multi manager fund of funds with fees of 1.63%, not cheap but I'd expect that to include all fees for the sub funds as well.
Seems as though for what you want to achieve you'd be better with vanguard lifestrategy, black rock consensus, or l &g multi index, the first two are around 0.3% fees, with the last at 0.5% but is more actively managed and holds property. You'd normally pay an extra 0.25% or slightly more to hold on a platform.0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Another reason for using isa is that its tax credit efficient, outside of isa im only allowed to make £300 a year before it affects them, I chose an accumulation fund rather than an income one as dividends would count towards this £300 limit
What tax credits for you mean, is this working or child or something else?
In terms of taxation of dividends it doesn't matter whether you hold funds as accumulation or income, you would still be liable for tax on them in either format, though not in an isa. Though there's also the new dividend allowance which means you can earn £5k tax per year without being taxed.0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Another reason for using isa is that its tax credit efficient, outside of isa im only allowed to make £300 a year before it affects them, I chose an accumulation fund rather than an income one as dividends would count towards this £300 limit
i don't know how tax credits work, but an accumulation fund, when held outside an ISA, does give you some taxable income (even though it isn't physically paid out), just the same as income fund does. inside an ISA, there is no taxable income, regardless of fund type. so if tax credits are based on your taxable income, an ISA is useful. though if it's affected by the amount of capital you have, capital inside an ISA still counts.0 -
Bigadaj - via halifax, 0.69% fee which i now assume is total
Child tax credits and thats why i use an isa. The £5k is taxed at 0% so still contributes to my £300 'other income' alliwance so Im hoping it wont via an isa
Grey gym - total savings not a factor
Potentially you could have quite a stonking s&s isa accumulation and still be on tax credits, its just I never have more than £500 a month to saveThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Hmmm have read that fettered does better due to lower costs and insight into portfolios
although if the fund house has a poor range or an expensive range, then fettered would not be a good option.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Well I suppose are all FTSE all share trackers roughly the same? If fees are all included it looks alright
This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
FTSE all share trackers are not all the same. For example, Virgin do one that has running costs of 1% a year. But others do them starting at closer to 0.1% (plus platform/broker fee). And the accuracy (tracking error) with which they track the index, will vary depending on how effectively they are put together. But broadly it doesn't matter as long as it's cheap, because the 'errors' will not always be negative (unless it's really bad at its job).
A tracker should be very cheap way to get exposure to markets and really only cost only a small fraction of a percent. If the tracker is a decent portion of the total assets, yet your overall fee on all of the assets is close to 0.7%, there is a lot in the middle for the middleman to get rich. Of course, you also have other funds in your mix, which are not trackers and would be more expensive, dragging up the overall cost.0 -
I'll have to check whether the other ones account for much of that 0.7ish%, and whether it can be beatenThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
