We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Urgent New build completion issue and consent to register charges
londonflatbuyer
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi there, I'm facing a bit of a situation with my new build purchase.
I am due to complete tomorrow on my flat (almost a year behind schedule but that is a different story...) and have run into an issue whereby the developer has a development loan secured against the block. My lender requires an undertaking from the seller's solicitor that they will obtain the existing bank's consent to register their interest as the lender on my flat. the seller's solicitor is stating that he cannot and will not provide such undertaking, however, in the same breath he has said that they will obtain the consent post completion and, as a big developer, they have done this "on thousands of flats."
My lawyer has tried to point out that, if he is so confident of the approval, it makes commercial sense for him to provide the undertaking but he is still refusing. he also states that as a consultant to and not an employee of the developer he can't provide the undertaking.
Has anyone come across this sort of situation before and how did you deal with it? I know others in the block have completed but they were either cash buyers who took a view on not having the undertaking or their lawyer must have been happy with it. My lawyer would proceed with completion despite no undertaking but unfortunately the bank's lawyer (I had to use two as mine was not on the panel) will not.
I have read the Law Soc's conveyancing regs and my view is that the seller's lawyer should be authorised to clear charges and provide such undertakings (as stated he should in the regs) and os he is potentially in breach of the regulations and can't hide behind his "consultant" defence.
I'm also of the view that the bank is protected by the implied covenants in the same regs and the laws surrounding purchase of property (I'm not a lawyer so don't have the full statute details to hand) that mean the vendor can't simply walk off with the money. Similarly the vendor is a big group who is not likely to screw us (although from my experience with banks they are driven by ticks in boxes and not taking views).
My lawyer has said she does not know what to do and unless one party backs down she can't see a way to get the bank to release funds. My last ditch attempt is to try and get my mortgage broker to lean on the guy he knows at the lender to see if he has a different interpretation to his lawyers and can go over their head, however this is a long shot!
I'm hoping someone here has come across the situation before and has an idea how to resolve it. Any help would be hugely appreciated! as you can imagine, with almost a year of delay I am keen to move in (not to mention not have to cancel the various furniture orders I have lined up).
Thanks!
I am due to complete tomorrow on my flat (almost a year behind schedule but that is a different story...) and have run into an issue whereby the developer has a development loan secured against the block. My lender requires an undertaking from the seller's solicitor that they will obtain the existing bank's consent to register their interest as the lender on my flat. the seller's solicitor is stating that he cannot and will not provide such undertaking, however, in the same breath he has said that they will obtain the consent post completion and, as a big developer, they have done this "on thousands of flats."
My lawyer has tried to point out that, if he is so confident of the approval, it makes commercial sense for him to provide the undertaking but he is still refusing. he also states that as a consultant to and not an employee of the developer he can't provide the undertaking.
Has anyone come across this sort of situation before and how did you deal with it? I know others in the block have completed but they were either cash buyers who took a view on not having the undertaking or their lawyer must have been happy with it. My lawyer would proceed with completion despite no undertaking but unfortunately the bank's lawyer (I had to use two as mine was not on the panel) will not.
I have read the Law Soc's conveyancing regs and my view is that the seller's lawyer should be authorised to clear charges and provide such undertakings (as stated he should in the regs) and os he is potentially in breach of the regulations and can't hide behind his "consultant" defence.
I'm also of the view that the bank is protected by the implied covenants in the same regs and the laws surrounding purchase of property (I'm not a lawyer so don't have the full statute details to hand) that mean the vendor can't simply walk off with the money. Similarly the vendor is a big group who is not likely to screw us (although from my experience with banks they are driven by ticks in boxes and not taking views).
My lawyer has said she does not know what to do and unless one party backs down she can't see a way to get the bank to release funds. My last ditch attempt is to try and get my mortgage broker to lean on the guy he knows at the lender to see if he has a different interpretation to his lawyers and can go over their head, however this is a long shot!
I'm hoping someone here has come across the situation before and has an idea how to resolve it. Any help would be hugely appreciated! as you can imagine, with almost a year of delay I am keen to move in (not to mention not have to cancel the various furniture orders I have lined up).
Thanks!
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards