We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Surveyors nominated by insurers
Knid
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hello all. Another first time poster seeking advice I'm afraid!
We're currently going through a grindingly protracted process to try and get insurance company and their adjustors/contractors to admit fault and fix up the results of some work done back in 2013. In short: they fixed subsidence cracks on SE London victorian house, and immediately afterwards we began developing severe damp, something that had never been an issue in the house before the work. We're convinced it's the render and plaster they used, they deny this. Have gone through ombudsman complaint, and the ombudsman's final ruling is that the insurers must now pay for a surveyor to assess the situation, and the surveyor will make a binding ruling on whether they are at fault. Insurers (well, the adjustors) to nominate four surveyors from which we then select one.
So the question is: what are the questions to ask the prospective surveyors in order to pick the best, most honest, least-!!!!!!ing-about, least-likely-to-side-with-a-big-company-that-gives-them-regular-work option of the four? I'm in no way technically minded (though learning a lot about moisture and various rendering processes!), so all advice is super appreciated. Just want this over with because we're currently unable to sell or rent the place until it's all dealt with. Thanks in advance...
We're currently going through a grindingly protracted process to try and get insurance company and their adjustors/contractors to admit fault and fix up the results of some work done back in 2013. In short: they fixed subsidence cracks on SE London victorian house, and immediately afterwards we began developing severe damp, something that had never been an issue in the house before the work. We're convinced it's the render and plaster they used, they deny this. Have gone through ombudsman complaint, and the ombudsman's final ruling is that the insurers must now pay for a surveyor to assess the situation, and the surveyor will make a binding ruling on whether they are at fault. Insurers (well, the adjustors) to nominate four surveyors from which we then select one.
So the question is: what are the questions to ask the prospective surveyors in order to pick the best, most honest, least-!!!!!!ing-about, least-likely-to-side-with-a-big-company-that-gives-them-regular-work option of the four? I'm in no way technically minded (though learning a lot about moisture and various rendering processes!), so all advice is super appreciated. Just want this over with because we're currently unable to sell or rent the place until it's all dealt with. Thanks in advance...
0
Comments
-
So it sounds like an RICS Chartered Surveyor will be instructed as a 'Joint Sole Expert' or something similar - is that right?
TBH, I think the top priority is to ensure that the building surveyor specialises in building defects. Check their websites to see if they specifically say they are building defect specialists, with experience in period properties. Maybe ask about the type of projects they typically do.
Also, ask whether removing some plaster and/or digging holes would assist with diagnosis (and who would cover costs of making good etc).
The most important thing is that they diagnose the problem correctly. It won't help if they tell the insurance co to re-plaster, if that doesn't solve the problem.0 -
As above - try to get a local surveyor that also has experience with the problem at hand. I would speak to them on the phone and see if they know much about the houses on your road, the building materials used, etc. Then ask if they have experience being a Joint Sole Expert with building defects (or just do 'bog-standard' house buying surveys).0
-
Thanks both, sage advice all round - especially to remember that the right diagnosis is more important than the "winning" diagnosis. Easy to get caught up in battling the insurance company especially when they drag their heels all the time, but you're right: there's no point winning the battle if it doesn't get your house fixed up properly.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards