We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Egg 125% Guaranteed Equity Bond

Hi all,

I noticed that there has been some discussion about this (and similar) products recently.

It has been stated that the main problem with this sort of product is that dividends aren't received whereas they would be if you invested in an index tracker etc instead.

However, the forward yield for the FTSE 100 is 3.3% which all things being equal over five years compounds to 17.6%. Therefore surely the Egg product is a good one because the extra 25% is more than the (estimated) 17.6% you would receive in dividends?

Am I totally missing something here? :mad:

Cheers,
Steve

Comments

  • oldfella
    oldfella Posts: 1,534 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    its based on the FTSE 100 which isnt an ideal place to be
    the return is taxed as interest not capital gains
    the return is reduced by averaging in the 5th year
    you cant time your exit
    you cant get out early

    having said that its a lot better than some GIBs
  • Ah, I see...

    So while the gross return looks pretty good the tax treatment ultimately makes it worse for the vast majority of investors.
  • nrsql
    nrsql Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    >> However, the forward yield for the FTSE 100 is 3.3% which all things being equal over five years compounds to 17.6%.

    The dividends would be re-invested so after payment they would be compounded at the increase in value of the index plus the dividend rate not just the dividend rate.

    Say the index increased by 10% per year and 3.3% dividend reinvested.
    After 5 years that would give 86% growth of which 61% was due to growth and 25% due to dividends.
    The GEB would give you 125% of the 61% which is 76% so a 10% loss.

    Of course the difference would be more if the growth was less, take into account the averaging of the last year also.
    No charge for the calculations so treat them with caution.
  • Hi nrsql,

    Yes, that makes sense. Thanks!

    Steve
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.