Deutsche Bank toxic derivative losses

AG47

westernpromise wrote: »

Total rubbish yet again. Here's the share price history of Deutsche Bank.
https://www.google.com/search?q=deutsche+bank+share+price+history&ie=&oe=

The highest price ever was in May 2007 and was 112.22. In the last 23 years, it's only been over 100 for a total of about 3 months, all of which were in the first half of 2007.

Who was saying it would never go under 100? Who would say that when for 99% of the last 23 years, it actually was under 100? Links please, or it's the voices in your head.


And was that before or after it went under 10?

Come on, pony up. If your predictive powers are that great, predict the share price at the end of this year. If DB is doomed, you can win free money (that you clearly need) off me.

See last post,

Here is the chart showing I am correct and that it was just under 160 circa 06/07

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/DB/deutsche-bank-aktiengesellschaft/stock-price-history

AG47

I am happy to bet with any DB cheerleaders that they are in very dire straits and things will only get worse.

Yes there are all kinds of games that can be played, bail in, bail outs, twisting and cooking the books.

They can keep kicking the can, but a turd is still a turd no matter how much you polish it

westernpromise

AG47 wrote: »

See last post,

Here is the chart showing I am correct and that it was just under 160 circa 06/07

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/DB/deutsche-bank-aktiengesellschaft/stock-price-history

From your own link:
Historical daily share price chart and data for Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft since 1996 adjusted for splits.
The all-time high Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft stock price is 124.00,

You don't know what 'adjusted for splits' means, do you?

there are all kinds of games that can be played

So let's play the FCD game. You short DB now with me at 6.40, and by year end you'll be a quardillionaire. What can go wrong?

Kentish_Dave

Your own link gives a high of 124, and it’s not adjusting correctly for splits.

AG47

Kentish Dave you adamantly stated that the share price was never more than 13 and you made such a fuss calling me out when I claimed the high was about 130, (sorry 124 to be specific)

Re read this post

Kentish_Dave wrote: »

To point out an important fact again, the OP is telling fibs, DB has never been over 100, his claims of 130 are outright lies.

OP, do you honestly not understand numbers? Why are you lying about where the share price was previously?

But on the chart I posted the intraday high was actually near to 160, this is factual from the chart I posted, but ok let's assume that intraday high was not accurate let's call it 124 to be precise, either you are still way wrong.

Just look at the chart I posted before you can clearly see it's almost 160

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/DB/deutsche-bank-aktiengesellschaft/stock-price-history

Kentish_Dave

AG47 wrote: »

Kentish Dave you adamantly stated that the share price was never more than 13

No, I don’t. Do you honestly struggle with English as much as you do with numbers.

When you started this campaign a couple of years back it was about thirteen. It had been much higher before that, it had never been at 150. Have another read and try to find me saying what you are suggesting I said.

Predicting a fall below 100 when it was thirteen is pathetic.

AG47

Kentish_Dave wrote: »

No, I don’t. Do you honestly struggle with English as much as you do with numbers.

When you started this campaign a couple of years back it was about thirteen. It had been much higher before that, it had never been at 150. Have another read and try to find me saying what you are suggesting I said.

Predicting a fall below 100 when it was thirteen is pathetic.

You can't deny your words,

Read again word for word,

Kentish_Dave wrote: »

To point out an important fact again, the OP is telling fibs, DB has never been over 100, his claims of 130 are outright lies.

OP, do you honestly not understand numbers? Why are you lying about where the share price was previously?

You claim DB was never above 100 I claim about 130 (124)

You were wrong I was right. End of.


Now getting back on topic, is it possible for them to reduce the 50 Trillion.

Kentish_Dave

I’ll check Bloomberg tomorrow, others have suggested it hit about 120 which I’ll check, but it was under 15 when you started your idiocy, and has never hit 150, so no, you are wrong.

Now, how about putting half as much effort as you have in here to getting a better job and helping your son?

I’m on the 07:15 flight to Amsterdam tomorrow to continue my work in banking, a job which I have applied for, been given, and done a year in since you’ve been on your crusade. What have you done?

lisyloo

Kentish_Dave wrote: »

I’m on the 07:15 flight to Amsterdam tomorrow to continue my work in banking, a job which I have applied for, been given, and done a year in since you’ve been on your crusade. What have you done?

This is so true.
I’ve been reading the crash trolls since 2001 during which time I’ve paid off the mortgage and bought a ticket to an early retirement.
I’m not clever or rich but crucially I’ve made continual progress towards Financial independence (and I don’t mean lowering your standards to someone else’s back bedroom).

AG47

Everything will be fine fifty trillion derivatives is not that big a number, don't even give it a second thought

Yes burry your head in the sand,

D Bank will be fine, it's not that big a number of derivatives if you say it quietly.

Coff Fifty trillion coff