We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CC deposit refund. Does it remove protection
speed1972
Posts: 8 Forumite
in Credit cards
Hiya Folks
We've just put a £1000 deposit on a used car from a main dealer. we were going to put another £6k down making the total deposit £7k. They had offered us £7k for our car but we decided to keep it.
Well the damn thing broke down on the way home needing a £3.5k repair bill. So spurious part fitted to get going so runs now but its NOT fixed.
We've told the dealer we are now P/X car in. But finance etc is all set up with a £7k deposit. If we P/X the car then we are effectively putting an £8k deposit down. They have said they would refund the £1000 already paid on CC.
Anyone know if that then removes our CC protection.
We've just put a £1000 deposit on a used car from a main dealer. we were going to put another £6k down making the total deposit £7k. They had offered us £7k for our car but we decided to keep it.
Well the damn thing broke down on the way home needing a £3.5k repair bill. So spurious part fitted to get going so runs now but its NOT fixed.
We've told the dealer we are now P/X car in. But finance etc is all set up with a £7k deposit. If we P/X the car then we are effectively putting an £8k deposit down. They have said they would refund the £1000 already paid on CC.
Anyone know if that then removes our CC protection.
0
Comments
-
Have you told the dealer your current car is now faulty?
If your CC deposit is refunded then you will no longer have protection.0 -
Interesting question. I would say probably not - but it depends on how the arrangements were made.
Option 1
It could be argued that the original contract was terminated by mutual consent. You now have a "new deal" with the supplier and this no longer involves paying anything by credit card. So no cover.
Option 2
Let's say you formed a contract and this was varied by mutual consent. It's worth looking at the text of S75:(1) If the debtor I]ie you[/I [...] has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement I]the credit card agreement[/I, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.You could make a case that the transaction was, in the first place, financed by the credit card. By mutual agreement, the deal was varied and true, the transaction is no longer "financed" by the credit card. But arguably that is irrelevant - there was financing initially. Afterall, if I buy a sofa on a credit card and pay it off the next day, the transaction is no longer "financed" by the credit card. It doesn't stop me making a S75 claim some months later. Of course a supplier refund isn't quite the same as a cardholder paying back the CC, though S75 doesn't make any distinction.
In summary, your only hope would be to argue an "option 2" and even then the situation is a bit precarious. Much better if you can at least retain the financing element. Can you separate out the part exchange part? Ie the dealer pays you directly for your old car?0 -
Much easier than all that legal guff - pay £1 on the credit card - you are then 100% covered.chattychappy wrote: »Interesting question. I would say probably not - but it depends on how the arrangements were made.
Option 1
It could be argued that the original contract was terminated by mutual consent. You now have a "new deal" with the supplier and this no longer involves paying anything by credit card. So no cover.
Option 2
Let's say you formed a contract and this was varied by mutual consent. It's worth looking at the text of S75:(1) If the debtor I]ie you[/I [...] has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement I]the credit card agreement[/I, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.You could make a case that the transaction was, in the first place, financed by the credit card. By mutual agreement, the deal was varied and true, the transaction is no longer "financed" by the credit card. But arguably that is irrelevant - there was financing initially. Afterall, if I buy a sofa on a credit card and pay it off the next day, the transaction is no longer "financed" by the credit card. It doesn't stop me making a S75 claim some months later. Of course a supplier refund isn't quite the same as a cardholder paying back the CC, though S75 doesn't make any distinction.
In summary, your only hope would be to argue an "option 2" and even then the situation is a bit precarious. Much better if you can at least retain the financing element. Can you separate out the part exchange part? Ie the dealer pays you directly for your old car?0 -
jonesMUFCforever wrote: »Much easier than all that legal guff
Cheeky monkey!0 -
But your happy to scam the dealer with a duff carDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
But your happy to scam the dealer with a duff car
Scam!! You've made a pretty big assumption there.
A: The dealer will be passing this vehicle off to another trader without a second thought
B: It's their risk to accept the vehicle
C: They have agreed a price to P/X without seeing the car
They haven't asked what condition the car is in.
E: They haven't asked whether the car is even running
F: They only asked that it has MOT, 2 keys and the handbook.
Scamming the dealer.....
But thank you to the more helpful posters. I may just get them to refund £999 or add some car mats onto the invoice.0 -
Someone will buy that car from a dealer without knowing that they are buying a £3500 bill to fix a hidden problem. At best they will have a battle with the dealer to get any of that back, at worst they won't have any redress against the dealer.loose does not rhyme with choose but lose does and is the word you meant to write.0
-
Someone will buy that car from a dealer without knowing that they are buying a £3500 bill to fix a hidden problem. At best they will have a battle with the dealer to get any of that back, at worst they won't have any redress against the dealer.
Why wouldn't they? I traded my car in with a leaky roof, told the dealer about it, he didn't care, the car was sold at auction0 -
Someone will buy that car from a dealer without knowing that they are buying a £3500 bill to fix a hidden problem. At best they will have a battle with the dealer to get any of that back, at worst they won't have any redress against the dealer.
The problem isn't hidden. If they press the aircon button then the fault will be obvious. Aircompressor has been replaced. New belts fitted but poss has a leak somewhere. So no cold air.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards