We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Hypothetical Car Accident Question

Had a near miss in morrisons car park earlier today and wondered who would have been at fault. Scenario is this

I was about to pull out and turn right when the car in front and slightly to the left reversed almost at the same instant ( presumably to let someone out so they could have the space.

If I hadn't immediately braked I would have hit there back passenger door.

So who would have been at fault.

Ps


You can turn right or left from leaving the parking space.
«1

Comments

  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Possibly 50/50. Clearly the car in front should not have reversed when it wasn't clear to do so, (obviously they didn't check their mirrors) but you should've been at a distance to be able to stop in time. If you had been stationary and they still reversed into you then they would be 100% at fault.
  • neilmcl wrote: »
    Possibly 50/50. Clearly the car in front should not have reversed when it wasn't clear to do so, (obviously they didn't check their mirrors) but you should've been at a distance to be able to stop in time. If you had been stationary and they still reversed into you then they would be 100% at fault.

    I was stationery and moving a matter of possibly two foot forward. The car that reversed was stationery and possibly two foot ahead and two foot to the left.

    Alls well that ends well as I braked but the car reversing wouldn't have been able to don't think they Evan seen me
  • I was stationery and moving a matter of possibly two foot forward. The car that reversed was stationery and possibly two foot ahead and two foot to the left.

    Alls well that ends well as I braked but the car reversing wouldn't have been able to don't think they Evan seen me

    So 50/50 then.
  • I was stationery and moving a matter of possibly two foot forward. The car that reversed was stationery and possibly two foot ahead and two foot to the left.

    Alls well that ends well as I braked but the car reversing wouldn't have been able to don't think they Evan seen me

    It went something like this


    Car X
    >

    X me about to move forward and right

    Car X reversed backwards just as I was pulling forwards
  • I was stationery and moving a matter of possibly two foot forward. The car that reversed was stationery and possibly two foot ahead and two foot to the left.

    Alls well that ends well as I braked but the car reversing wouldn't have been able to don't think they Evan seen me


    Probably agree but annoying ( or would have been)

    As you don't expect someone to reverse in a car park without checking to see if someone behind you was about to pull out
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It went something like this


    Car X
    >

    X me about to move forward and right

    Car X reversed backwards just as I was pulling forwards
    We get it! Your scenario, had you continued and made contact would have resulted in a 50/50.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Probably agree but annoying ( or would have been)

    As you don't expect someone to reverse in a car park without checking to see if someone behind you was about to pull out
    Why are you quoting and agreeing with yourself. Strange ;)
  • Meant to quote the person above pressed the wrong button. Really should pay more attention
  • Probably agree but annoying ( or would have been)

    As you don't expect someone to reverse in a car park without checking to see if someone behind you was about to pull out

    Some wouldn't expect a car to pull out when they were reversing, so it works both ways.
  • Meant to quote the person above pressed the wrong button. Really should pay more attention


    Which is the whole point to this thread!:D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.