We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Renting to company on behalf of employee
Options

flyer
Posts: 2,279 Forumite


I wonder if someone can give me some advice.
I am renting my house to a company and one of their relocating employees is moving in. The company is paying the rent.
Is there a separate rental agreement for this situation or, should I just use the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement? If the latter, who is the tenant, the company or the employee?
TIA
I am renting my house to a company and one of their relocating employees is moving in. The company is paying the rent.
Is there a separate rental agreement for this situation or, should I just use the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement? If the latter, who is the tenant, the company or the employee?
TIA
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.
0
Comments
-
I would suggest you avoid involving the company in this.
Let direct to the employee
The company pays the employee
The employee pays you the rent.0 -
If you let directly to the employee you may have to agree to a shorter-than-normal rental period, such as 3 months. In my experience of being relocated, the employer rarely pays for more than this. If you want a 12-month agreement the employee might not sign.
An alternative is to sign with the company, who might put several successive relocating employees there, or might put weekly visitors there. It could be a good relationship you foster with the company.
My company had a tenancy with a landlord and the house is rarely empty.0 -
Thank you. I thought that would be the way to go but just wanted reassurance!Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.0
-
It will be a company let, therefore you will not have an AST.0
-
There's definitely pros to renting to a company, they pay the rent, and they'll ensure the property is returned in a good condition.
The downside is that you cant use s.21 etc to end the tenancy, as it's a corporate lease0 -
If you let directly to the employee you may have to agree to a shorter-than-normal rental period, such as 3 months. In my experience of being relocated, the employer rarely pays for more than this. If you want a 12-month agreement the employee might not sign.
An alternative is to sign with the company, who might put several successive relocating employees there, or might put weekly visitors there. It could be a good relationship you foster with the company.
My company had a tenancy with a landlord and the house is rarely empty.
Thank you. The company has already told me the employee will be in the property for at least 12 months.Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.0 -
Thank you. The company has already told me the employee will be in the property for at least 12 months.
Do you know whether this employee has been with the company for a long time, or a new hire with a probation period?
Remember that a relocating new employee might get the boot within their probation period more readily than an established employee, and might like to re-re-locate back whence they came. This could mean even if the employee plans to stay for 12 months, they might not be able to.0 -
Do you know whether this employee has been with the company for a long time, or a new hire with a probation period?
Remember that a relocating new employee might get the boot within their probation period more readily than an established employee, and might like to re-re-locate back whence they came. This could mean even if the employee plans to stay for 12 months, they might not be able to.
Been with them for a long time and has been seconded from abroad at considerable expense!Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.0 -
Been with them for a long time and has been seconded from abroad at considerable expense!
Bringing the family? I work for an international company and we do have people go on what were supposed to be long secondments then come back again quickly if the other half and the kids hate it there (most recently one of my colleagues came back after six months in Hong Kong because his wife couldn't settle in, and he was meant to be gone for 2-3 years). Presumably even if you have a 12 month fixed term AST with the employee you'd find it very difficult to pursue them for the unpaid rent if they disappeared back off to another country halfway through. I'd imagine the employee being foreign would make the option of leasing to the company more attractive.0 -
gingercordial wrote: »Bringing the family? I work for an international company and we do have people go on what were supposed to be long secondments then come back again quickly if the other half and the kids hate it there (most recently one of my colleagues came back after six months in Hong Kong because his wife couldn't settle in, and he was meant to be gone for 2-3 years). Presumably even if you have a 12 month fixed term AST with the employee you'd find it very difficult to pursue them for the unpaid rent if they disappeared back off to another country halfway through. I'd imagine the employee being foreign would make the option of leasing to the company more attractive.
Just the husband, they have no childrenEven if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards