PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Minimum size for a one bed flat

Options
Someone on Homes Under the Hammer today said that a one bed flat has to be a minimum of 40 square metres in size.

I have a flat in a Victorian conversion that I'm pretty sure doesn't have that amount of floor space, it is short by about five square metres. The overall layout is a square, so it's not too hard to calculate.

I bought it eight years ago as a cash buyer. Is it now unsaleable, or worse than that, illegal?

I use it as a second home/base, so it isn't rented out, and it is perfectly adequate for my purposes.
:D I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe :D

Comments

  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I'm a very charitable person and as you have now have a completely unsaleable property would generously offer you £5,000 for it
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • maisie_cat
    maisie_cat Posts: 2,136 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Academoney Grad
    I would have thought that any minimum standards would apply to new build or conversion only. There will always be a market for tiny flats & even if hard to mortgage there will always be cash buyers.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,942 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Bogof_Babe wrote: »
    Someone on Homes Under the Hammer today said that a one bed flat has to be a minimum of 40 square metres in size.

    Were they talking about planning/development control standards?

    If so, that specific planning authority won't grant new planning consents for one bed flats of less than 40 sq mtrs.

    - Those standards can change over time (the limit may have been, say, 30 sq mtrs 8 years ago)
    - Those standards vary by planning authority

    Your flat would have been granted planning consent based on the standards at the time. Consent cannot be revoked now.

    Bogof_Babe wrote: »
    I bought it eight years ago as a cash buyer. Is it now unsaleable, or worse than that, illegal?

    Some mortgage lenders won't lend on a studio, and those that do won't lend on one under 30 sq mtrs. So some might also be concerned about a small 1 bed flat.

    But even if a mortgage is a problem, you can still sell to other cash buyers.
  • Bogof_Babe
    Bogof_Babe Posts: 10,803 Forumite
    Thanks for the replies, especially yours eddddy.

    The building was converted in 1986 into six flats, mine being the smallest, and a 999 year lease runs from that date. I'm not thinking of selling any time soon, but obviously at some point it will have to be put on the market.

    Relieved to know it was acceptable at the time, and they presumably can't back-track on the regulations.

    I can't understand why it wouldn't be perfectly adequate for a single person. It is a bit cramped when my husband (rarely) stays there with me, but a young couple would manage for a while I'm sure. It has a separate kitchen and isn't a studio, the bedroom fits a double bed and a couple of fitted wardrobes, so it works well. The bathroom and lounge are quite a decent size for the type of property, and there is a central vestibule area (big enough for a table and chairs) that all the rooms are off, so the layout is good.
    :D I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe :D

  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Came across many tiny flats in the 1980s/90s, as well as 1 bed "cluster homes" most still in existence. The cluster homes were new/very recent build at the time and had less than 40 sq m of accom.
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,685 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Overcrowding law (Housing Act 1985 Part X ..)
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/68/part/X
    - which DOES apply to owner-occupiers, see s327 - gives minimum bedroom sizes and that would apply. But, for example, this gives..
    Floor area
    The minimum floor area considered enough for your family is:

    50 - 69 square feet (4.6 - 6.5 square metres) for 0.5 people
    70 - 89 square feet (6.5 - 8.4 square metres) for 1 person
    90 - 109 square feet (8.4 -10 square metres) for 1.5 people
    110 square feet (10.2 square metres) for 2 people
    - way, way lower than 40 sq mtrs or even 200 sq ft.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,323 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I guess it doesn't apply to homeless people when they stick a family of five in a room (even if a child = 0.5 people).
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I guess it doesn't apply to homeless people when they stick a family of five in a room (even if a child = 0.5 people).

    It doesn't work like that.

    Putting homeless people into one room = stopping them from sleeping on the streets while/until the "right sized" property becomes available to them to move into.

    Different thing altogether.

    If whoever "put" them into the room HAD something of a suitable size they'd have been put there instead. A room isn't some arbitrary punishment, or illegal activity, it's a response to an immediate and urgent need. They can't magic up the right sized properties on a whim.
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,685 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Such housing can still be challenged on the basis of "unsuitability": But the reality is, it happens, wrong, but it does. Part 7 Housing Act 1996 I think..
    e.g.
    http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2001/june/ron-the-application-of-khan-v-newham-london-borough-council
    &
    http://nearlylegal.co.uk/2008/12/refusing-temporary-accommodation/
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.