We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Small Claims...two defendants, only one defence

Someone I know has got a small claims case ongoing.


Named two defendants, but only one has acknowledged the case and submitted a defence.


Can he apply for a summary judgement against the one who hasn't submitted an acknowledgement/defence [after the appropriate 14/28 days]???




If 'yes', is it for the full amount??


Does the case automatically get closed if he gets the full amount awarded from the non-responding defendant??

Comments

  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Surely the case will go ahead with the one defendant defending? If the case is won then the claim will (likely) be enforced against both defendants (but that depends on what the judge orders).
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part12#12.8
    Claim against more than one defendant
    12.8
    (1) A claimant may obtain a default judgment on request under this Part on a claim for money or a claim for delivery of goods against one of two or more defendants, and proceed with his claim against the other defendants.
    (2) Where a claimant applies for a default judgment against one of two or more defendants –
    (a) if the claim can be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants –
    (i) the court may enter a default judgment against that defendant; and
    (ii) the claimant may continue the proceedings against the other defendants;
    (b) if the claim cannot be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants –
    (i) the court will not enter default judgment against that defendant; and
    (ii) the court must deal with the application at the same time as it disposes of the claim against the other defendants.
    (3) A claimant may not enforce against one of two or more defendants any judgment obtained under this Part for possession of land or for delivery of goods unless –
    (a) he has obtained a judgment for possession or delivery (whether or not obtained under this Part) against all the defendants to the claim; or
    (b) the court gives permission.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Huh, so it would seem you can! What a strange system
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    arcon5 wrote: »
    Huh, so it would seem you can! What a strange system

    Depends on the particulars of the claim though and in some instances, it may even be ill advised to do so.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.