We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Do I need to buy another Apple TV?

2»

Comments

  • henm2
    henm2 Posts: 723 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Connect your TV with a Amazon Fire stick £35 and a free installation of Kodi and good selection of video add ons. This works out so much cheaper.
  • almillar
    almillar Posts: 8,621 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    my iPhone connects to Microsoft Exchange fine
    iPhone got this functionality late, and only due to pressure/competition. You forget all the years iOS didn't have those features when other OSs had - multitasking etc. Still no file transfer via bluetooth, something my Nokia had in 2003. Not a technical limitation, you just have to do things their way. Their computers are far better at interoperability these days, so it's mostly in the past, at least for OSX.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,102 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    almillar wrote: »
    iPhone got this functionality late, and only due to pressure/competition. You forget all the years iOS didn't have those features when other OSs had - multitasking etc. Still no file transfer via bluetooth, something my Nokia had in 2003. Not a technical limitation, you just have to do things their way. Their computers are far better at interoperability these days, so it's mostly in the past, at least for OSX.
    So basically not relevant nowadays then?

    As for bluetooth, I'm not sure I would want to transfer files via that.

    My new car hooked up to my iPhone and allows me to make calls via bluetooth and play music stored on it.
  • almillar
    almillar Posts: 8,621 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So basically not relevant nowadays then?
    You've got the feature now, but just don't get caught thinking iOS has innovated with all this stuff. How long will you have to wait for the next feature that Android phones, for example, have? They have a history of dragging their heels on some features, and that IS relevant to nowadays, and the future.
    As for bluetooth, I'm not sure I would want to transfer files via that.
    That's OK, but plenty of other people were kicking and screaming about it for years. Less relevant these days.
    My new car hooked up to my iPhone and allows me to make calls via bluetooth and play music stored on it.

    As does any other modern smartphone.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,102 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    almillar wrote: »
    You've got the feature now, but just don't get caught thinking iOS has innovated with all this stuff. How long will you have to wait for the next feature that Android phones, for example, have? They have a history of dragging their heels on some features, and that IS relevant to nowadays, and the future.
    Sure - what I have now works.
    I have an Android phone (Samsung), but it's a bit clunky, so I found it a bit difficult to get enthusiastic about.

    Aside from phones, I've got a Windows tablet, but it's a dull place to be.
    almillar wrote: »
    That's OK, but plenty of other people were kicking and screaming about it for years. Less relevant these days.
    Aye - I never needed it, so I guess it wasn't an issue. I've been happy to email photos.
    almillar wrote: »
    As does any other modern smartphone.
    Sure, so neutral in the anti-Apple stakes then.
  • Johnmcl7
    Johnmcl7 Posts: 2,842 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    prowla wrote: »
    I really don't get the basis of the myth that Apple products are any more closed than other brands.

    It's not a myth, this very thread is a good example of that - Miracast is a standard streaming technology developed by the wi-fi alliance supported by a large number of companies including the OP's TV but not Apple who developed their own proprietary airplay standard.

    Similarly with smartwatches, you can't use an Apple watch with an Android device while you can use Android Wear with an IOS device although Apple cripple some of the hardware access to third party companies which restricts the functionality, same issue with Garmin watches on IOS as well.

    With regards to bluetooth, it's generally been poorly implemented on IOS devices and more recently Apple still refuse to support NFC for anything other than Apple Pay instead favouring their own proprietary system that only works between Apple devices.

    I've seen people defend this approach to improve connections between systems since Apple enforce control of all of it but it's extremely strange to see someone claim it's just a myth.

    John
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,102 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Johnmcl7 wrote: »
    It's not a myth, this very thread is a good example of that - Miracast is a standard streaming technology developed by the wi-fi alliance supported by a large number of companies including the OP's TV but not Apple who developed their own proprietary airplay standard.

    Similarly with smartwatches, you can't use an Apple watch with an Android device while you can use Android Wear with an IOS device although Apple cripple some of the hardware access to third party companies which restricts the functionality, same issue with Garmin watches on IOS as well.

    With regards to bluetooth, it's generally been poorly implemented on IOS devices and more recently Apple still refuse to support NFC for anything other than Apple Pay instead favouring their own proprietary system that only works between Apple devices.

    I've seen people defend this approach to improve connections between systems since Apple enforce control of all of it but it's extremely strange to see someone claim it's just a myth.

    John
    Well, AirPlay pre-dates Miracast, so you can't blame Apple because another group of other companies got together and copied them, can you?

    I've got a Western Digital NAS drive and it uses its standard.

    And then you've got twonky and suchlike.

    So there are plenty of methods.

    As far as Bluetooth goes, the question is how far should it go? I've seen it as a mechanism for attaching peripherals, not as a general networking service, which I think it was never designed for.

    If you want file transfer, use Wi-Fi.

    On the watch front, I have to say that I just don't "get" the Apple watch; it seems to me to be a "because they can" product rather than something I would care to own.

    I would say that the market is not yet mature regarding interoperability; we are in the phase where there are miscellaneous point solutions and competing products about; it'll be a while before there is rationalisation and things sort themselves out.

    I don't think it is valid to single out one company (which actually has the widest range of products) and blame them because they're not following others.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.