We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Do I need to buy another Apple TV?
Comments
-
Connect your TV with a Amazon Fire stick £35 and a free installation of Kodi and good selection of video add ons. This works out so much cheaper.0
-
iPhone got this functionality late, and only due to pressure/competition. You forget all the years iOS didn't have those features when other OSs had - multitasking etc. Still no file transfer via bluetooth, something my Nokia had in 2003. Not a technical limitation, you just have to do things their way. Their computers are far better at interoperability these days, so it's mostly in the past, at least for OSX.my iPhone connects to Microsoft Exchange fine0 -
So basically not relevant nowadays then?iPhone got this functionality late, and only due to pressure/competition. You forget all the years iOS didn't have those features when other OSs had - multitasking etc. Still no file transfer via bluetooth, something my Nokia had in 2003. Not a technical limitation, you just have to do things their way. Their computers are far better at interoperability these days, so it's mostly in the past, at least for OSX.
As for bluetooth, I'm not sure I would want to transfer files via that.
My new car hooked up to my iPhone and allows me to make calls via bluetooth and play music stored on it.0 -
You've got the feature now, but just don't get caught thinking iOS has innovated with all this stuff. How long will you have to wait for the next feature that Android phones, for example, have? They have a history of dragging their heels on some features, and that IS relevant to nowadays, and the future.So basically not relevant nowadays then?
That's OK, but plenty of other people were kicking and screaming about it for years. Less relevant these days.As for bluetooth, I'm not sure I would want to transfer files via that.My new car hooked up to my iPhone and allows me to make calls via bluetooth and play music stored on it.
As does any other modern smartphone.0 -
Sure - what I have now works.You've got the feature now, but just don't get caught thinking iOS has innovated with all this stuff. How long will you have to wait for the next feature that Android phones, for example, have? They have a history of dragging their heels on some features, and that IS relevant to nowadays, and the future.
I have an Android phone (Samsung), but it's a bit clunky, so I found it a bit difficult to get enthusiastic about.
Aside from phones, I've got a Windows tablet, but it's a dull place to be.
Aye - I never needed it, so I guess it wasn't an issue. I've been happy to email photos.That's OK, but plenty of other people were kicking and screaming about it for years. Less relevant these days.
Sure, so neutral in the anti-Apple stakes then.As does any other modern smartphone.0 -
I really don't get the basis of the myth that Apple products are any more closed than other brands.
It's not a myth, this very thread is a good example of that - Miracast is a standard streaming technology developed by the wi-fi alliance supported by a large number of companies including the OP's TV but not Apple who developed their own proprietary airplay standard.
Similarly with smartwatches, you can't use an Apple watch with an Android device while you can use Android Wear with an IOS device although Apple cripple some of the hardware access to third party companies which restricts the functionality, same issue with Garmin watches on IOS as well.
With regards to bluetooth, it's generally been poorly implemented on IOS devices and more recently Apple still refuse to support NFC for anything other than Apple Pay instead favouring their own proprietary system that only works between Apple devices.
I've seen people defend this approach to improve connections between systems since Apple enforce control of all of it but it's extremely strange to see someone claim it's just a myth.
John0 -
Well, AirPlay pre-dates Miracast, so you can't blame Apple because another group of other companies got together and copied them, can you?It's not a myth, this very thread is a good example of that - Miracast is a standard streaming technology developed by the wi-fi alliance supported by a large number of companies including the OP's TV but not Apple who developed their own proprietary airplay standard.
Similarly with smartwatches, you can't use an Apple watch with an Android device while you can use Android Wear with an IOS device although Apple cripple some of the hardware access to third party companies which restricts the functionality, same issue with Garmin watches on IOS as well.
With regards to bluetooth, it's generally been poorly implemented on IOS devices and more recently Apple still refuse to support NFC for anything other than Apple Pay instead favouring their own proprietary system that only works between Apple devices.
I've seen people defend this approach to improve connections between systems since Apple enforce control of all of it but it's extremely strange to see someone claim it's just a myth.
John
I've got a Western Digital NAS drive and it uses its standard.
And then you've got twonky and suchlike.
So there are plenty of methods.
As far as Bluetooth goes, the question is how far should it go? I've seen it as a mechanism for attaching peripherals, not as a general networking service, which I think it was never designed for.
If you want file transfer, use Wi-Fi.
On the watch front, I have to say that I just don't "get" the Apple watch; it seems to me to be a "because they can" product rather than something I would care to own.
I would say that the market is not yet mature regarding interoperability; we are in the phase where there are miscellaneous point solutions and competing products about; it'll be a while before there is rationalisation and things sort themselves out.
I don't think it is valid to single out one company (which actually has the widest range of products) and blame them because they're not following others.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
