We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage Valuation a whopping 77k under agreed sale price
Options
Comments
-
Yes I think lots of people pay more than what things are worth if they bought with cash. Maybe not 6x something's value, but certainly a hefty percentage. That's why credit works imo. Buying a sofa interest free spread over 4 years more people will buy than paying the same price at the beginning.
I suppose it depends how savvy you are and this is mse after all.Never again will the wolf get so close to my door :eek:0 -
I think there is a lot to be said for the way people fund a purchase of a house, or anything else for that matter. If someone will provide loans for any amount that enables someone to get what they really want, many people will take it (hence the mess people get into).
A bank owns a share of the house to the value of the loan, the loan is against the house and is an asset the bank can seize if the debt isn't repaid, so the way I see it is that it's not "your" house until you have the deeds. Also banks won't lend what they value at, only a percentage, which to me speaks volumes of the risk element associated with house prices.
I agree my analogy in my previous post was rubbish.
Lenders were the main culprits in inflating the bubble, and in this case it looks like they are the main culprits in deflating it as well.0 -
Yes I think lots of people pay more than what things are worth if they bought with cash. Maybe not 6x something's value, but certainly a hefty percentage. That's why credit works imo. Buying a sofa interest free spread over 4 years more people will buy than paying the same price at the beginning.
I suppose it depends how savvy you are and this is mse after all.
Perfect example is a "free" mobile phone on £40+ a month 24 months contract.0 -
I think it's exactly the other way around. People pay more because it's on credit and doesn't seem much monthly. You pay premium for the fact that you don't have the whole amount at hand.
Perfect example is a "free" mobile phone on £40+ a month 24 months contract.
Big step up from a mobile to a 700k + house though?0 -
Could have been a whopping 79k after any Brexit vote!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards